[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9DD61F30A802C4429A01CA4200E302A7A5A4FBAC@fmsmsx124.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:09:36 +0000
From: "Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
To: 'Jason Gunthorpe' <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Gal Pressman <galpress@...zon.com>
CC: "dledford@...hat.com" <dledford@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ismail, Mustafa" <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Yossi Leybovich <sleybo@...zon.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC v1 12/19] RDMA/irdma: Implement device supported verb APIs
>Subject: Re: [RFC v1 12/19] RDMA/irdma: Implement device supported verb APIs
>
[..]
>> > + ret = irdma_alloc_rsrc(iwdev->rf,
>> > + iwdev->rf->allocated_mrs, iwdev->rf->max_mr,
>> > + &stag_index, &next_stag_index);
>> > + if (!ret) {
>> > + stag = stag_index << IRDMA_CQPSQ_STAG_IDX_S;
>> > + stag |= driver_key;
>> > + stag += (u32)consumer_key;
>> > + irdma_add_devusecount(iwdev);
>> > + }
>>
>> This is confusing IMHO, better to test for 'if (ret)' and keep the
>> main flow unindented.
>
>Yes please follow the standard 'success oriented flow'
>
OK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists