[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20f3652d-479b-7be1-cf13-e7d8a61dca9e@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 19:23:33 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: Add ICMPv6 support when parse route ipproto
On 2/25/19 7:17 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> I also thought about this issue. Currently we didn't check the ipproto in both
> IPv4 and IPv6. You can set icmp in ip6 rules or icmpv6 in ipv4 rules.
> This looks don't make any serious problem. It's just a user mis-configuration,
> the kernel check the proto number and won't match normal IP/IPv6 headers.
>
> But yes, we should make it more strict, do you think if I should add a new
> rtm_getroute_parse_ip6_proto() function, or just add a family parameter
> in previous function?
I see now. rtm_getroute_parse_ip_proto is used for ipv4 and ipv6. For v4
IPPROTO_ICMPV6 should not be allowed and for v6 IPPROTO_ICMP should
fail. You could a version argument to rtm_getroute_parse_ip_proto and
fail as needed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists