netdev - [PATCH net-next v2 09/12] net: sched: flower: handle concurrent tcf proto deletion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190227101226.26196-10-vladbu@mellanox.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Feb 2019 12:12:23 +0200
From:   Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        davem@...emloft.net, sbrivio@...hat.com,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 09/12] net: sched: flower: handle concurrent tcf proto deletion

Without rtnl lock protection tcf proto can be deleted concurrently. Check
tcf proto 'deleting' flag after taking tcf spinlock to verify that no
concurrent deletion is in progress. Return EAGAIN error if concurrent
deletion detected, which will cause caller to retry and possibly create new
instance of tcf proto.

Retry mechanism is a result of fine-grained locking approach used in this
and previous changes in series and is necessary to allow concurrent updates
on same chain instance. Alternative approach would be to lock the whole
chain while updating filters on any of child tp's, adding and removing
classifier instances from the chain. However, since most CPU-intensive
parts of filter update code are specifically in classifier code and its
dependencies (extensions and hw offloads), such approach would negate most
of the gains introduced by this change and previous changes in the series
when updating same chain instance.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
---
Changes from V1 to V2:
  - Extend commit message.
  - Fix error code in comment.

 net/sched/cls_flower.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_flower.c b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
index 70b357f23391..25a4d64b82db 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_flower.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_flower.c
@@ -1500,6 +1500,14 @@ static int fl_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
 	if (!tc_in_hw(fnew->flags))
 		fnew->flags |= TCA_CLS_FLAGS_NOT_IN_HW;

+	/* tp was deleted concurrently. -EAGAIN will cause caller to lookup
+	 * proto again or create new one, if necessary.
+	 */
+	if (tp->deleting) {
+		err = -EAGAIN;
+		goto errout_hw;
+	}
+
 	refcount_inc(&fnew->refcnt);
 	if (fold) {
 		/* Fold filter was deleted concurrently. Retry lookup. */
-- 
2.13.6