[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190228090538.GI15253@mtr-leonro.mtl.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:05:38 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shamir Rabinovitch <shamir.rabinovitch@...cle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the rdma tree
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:24:51AM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-02-27 at 11:25 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/Kconfig
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 6fa8f1afd337 ("IB/{core,uverbs}: Move ib_umem_xxx functions from ib_core to ib_uverbs")
> >
> > from the rdma tree and commit:
> >
> > f4b6bcc7002f ("net: devlink: turn devlink into a built-in")
> >
> > from the net-next tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
> >
>
> Thanks Stephen, we'll add it to the (largish this release) list of
> conflicts to bring to Linus' attention.
Thanks
>
> --
> Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
> GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
> Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists