netdev - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 12/64] wlcore: sdio: Fixup power on/off sequence

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190228151105.11277-12-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:10:13 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 12/64] wlcore: sdio: Fixup power on/off sequence

From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>

[ Upstream commit 13e62626c578d9889ebbda7c521be5adff9bef8e ]

During "wlan-up", we are programming the FW into the WiFi-chip. However,
re-programming the FW doesn't work, unless a power cycle of the WiFi-chip
is made in-between the programmings.

To conform to this requirement and to fix the regression in a simple way,
let's start by allowing that the SDIO card (WiFi-chip) may stay powered on
(runtime resumed) when wl12xx_sdio_power_off() returns. The intent with the
current code is to treat this scenario as an error, but unfortunate this
doesn't work as expected, so let's fix this.

The other part is to guarantee that a power cycle of the SDIO card has been
completed when wl12xx_sdio_power_on() returns, as to allow the FW
programming to succeed. However, relying solely on runtime PM to deal with
this isn't sufficient. For example, userspace may prevent runtime suspend
via sysfs for the device that represents the SDIO card, leading to that the
mmc core also keeps it powered on. For this reason, let's instead do a
brute force power cycle in wl12xx_sdio_power_on().

Fixes: 728a9dc61f13 ("wlcore: sdio: Fix flakey SDIO runtime PM handling")
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c | 15 +++++++--------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
index 750bea3574ee4..627df164b7b6d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
@@ -164,6 +164,12 @@ static int wl12xx_sdio_power_on(struct wl12xx_sdio_glue *glue)
 	}

 	sdio_claim_host(func);
+	/*
+	 * To guarantee that the SDIO card is power cycled, as required to make
+	 * the FW programming to succeed, let's do a brute force HW reset.
+	 */
+	mmc_hw_reset(card->host);
+
 	sdio_enable_func(func);
 	sdio_release_host(func);

@@ -174,20 +180,13 @@ static int wl12xx_sdio_power_off(struct wl12xx_sdio_glue *glue)
 {
 	struct sdio_func *func = dev_to_sdio_func(glue->dev);
 	struct mmc_card *card = func->card;
-	int error;

 	sdio_claim_host(func);
 	sdio_disable_func(func);
 	sdio_release_host(func);

 	/* Let runtime PM know the card is powered off */
-	error = pm_runtime_put(&card->dev);
-	if (error < 0 && error != -EBUSY) {
-		dev_err(&card->dev, "%s failed: %i\n", __func__, error);
-
-		return error;
-	}
-
+	pm_runtime_put(&card->dev);
 	return 0;
 }

-- 
2.19.1