lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190228150813.10256-45-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:07:37 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Martynas Pumputis <m@...bda.lt>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.20 45/81] bpf, selftests: fix handling of sparse CPU allocations

From: Martynas Pumputis <m@...bda.lt>

[ Upstream commit 1bb54c4071f585ebef56ce8fdfe6026fa2cbcddd ]

Previously, bpf_num_possible_cpus() had a bug when calculating a
number of possible CPUs in the case of sparse CPU allocations, as
it was considering only the first range or element of
/sys/devices/system/cpu/possible.

E.g. in the case of "0,2-3" (CPU 1 is not available), the function
returned 1 instead of 3.

This patch fixes the function by making it parse all CPU ranges and
elements.

Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis <m@...bda.lt>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
index 315a44fa32af3..84fd6f1bf33e7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void)
 	unsigned int start, end, possible_cpus = 0;
 	char buff[128];
 	FILE *fp;
-	int n;
+	int len, n, i, j = 0;
 
 	fp = fopen(fcpu, "r");
 	if (!fp) {
@@ -21,17 +21,27 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void)
 		exit(1);
 	}
 
-	while (fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) {
-		n = sscanf(buff, "%u-%u", &start, &end);
-		if (n == 0) {
-			printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n");
-			exit(1);
-		} else if (n == 1) {
-			end = start;
+	if (!fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) {
+		printf("Failed to read %s!\n", fcpu);
+		exit(1);
+	}
+
+	len = strlen(buff);
+	for (i = 0; i <= len; i++) {
+		if (buff[i] == ',' || buff[i] == '\0') {
+			buff[i] = '\0';
+			n = sscanf(&buff[j], "%u-%u", &start, &end);
+			if (n <= 0) {
+				printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n");
+				exit(1);
+			} else if (n == 1) {
+				end = start;
+			}
+			possible_cpus += end - start + 1;
+			j = i + 1;
 		}
-		possible_cpus = start == 0 ? end + 1 : 0;
-		break;
 	}
+
 	fclose(fp);
 
 	return possible_cpus;
-- 
2.19.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ