[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZsYnvQZTqB6g9RocZpuCMxZ+eCnLqBccerFNkQ8ReEFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:05:45 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] samples: bpf: use libbpf where easy
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 3:31 PM Jakub Kicinski
<jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
>
> Some samples don't really need the magic of bpf_load,
> switch them to libbpf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
> ---
> samples/bpf/Makefile | 6 +++---
> samples/bpf/fds_example.c | 9 ++++++---
> samples/bpf/sockex1_user.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
> samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> index 4dd98100678e..0c62ac39c697 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ LIBBPF = $(TOOLS_PATH)/lib/bpf/libbpf.a
> CGROUP_HELPERS := ../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.o
> TRACE_HELPERS := ../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/trace_helpers.o
>
> -fds_example-objs := bpf_load.o fds_example.o
> -sockex1-objs := bpf_load.o sockex1_user.o
> -sockex2-objs := bpf_load.o sockex2_user.o
> +fds_example-objs := fds_example.o
> +sockex1-objs := sockex1_user.o
> +sockex2-objs := sockex2_user.o
> sockex3-objs := bpf_load.o sockex3_user.o
> tracex1-objs := bpf_load.o tracex1_user.o
> tracex2-objs := bpf_load.o tracex2_user.o
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/fds_example.c b/samples/bpf/fds_example.c
> index 9854854f05d1..36f1f18aae3c 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/fds_example.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/fds_example.c
> @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
>
> #include <bpf/bpf.h>
>
> +#include "bpf/libbpf.h"
> #include "bpf_insn.h"
> -#include "bpf_load.h"
> #include "sock_example.h"
>
> #define BPF_F_PIN (1 << 0)
> @@ -57,10 +57,13 @@ static int bpf_prog_create(const char *object)
> BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> };
> size_t insns_cnt = sizeof(insns) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn);
> + char bpf_log_buf[BPF_LOG_BUF_SIZE];
> + struct bpf_object *obj;
> + int prog_fd;
>
> if (object) {
> - assert(!load_bpf_file((char *)object));
> - return prog_fd[0];
> + assert(!bpf_prog_load(object, 0, &obj, &prog_fd));
Here and in few more places below: is it possible to specify correct
bpf_prog_type instead of 0?
> + return prog_fd;
> } else {
> return bpf_load_program(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
> insns, insns_cnt, "GPL", 0,
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/sockex1_user.c b/samples/bpf/sockex1_user.c
> index be8ba5686924..5e7c4be3e645 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/sockex1_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/sockex1_user.c
> @@ -3,28 +3,30 @@
> #include <assert.h>
> #include <linux/bpf.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf.h>
> -#include "bpf_load.h"
> +#include "bpf/libbpf.h"
> #include "sock_example.h"
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <arpa/inet.h>
>
> int main(int ac, char **argv)
> {
> + struct bpf_object *obj;
> + int map_fd, prog_fd;
> char filename[256];
> - FILE *f;
> int i, sock;
> + FILE *f;
>
> snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
>
> - if (load_bpf_file(filename)) {
> - printf("%s", bpf_log_buf);
> + if (bpf_prog_load(filename, 0, &obj, &prog_fd))
> return 1;
> - }
> +
> + map_fd = bpf_object__find_map_fd_by_name(obj, "my_map");
>
> sock = open_raw_sock("lo");
>
> - assert(setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_BPF, prog_fd,
> - sizeof(prog_fd[0])) == 0);
> + assert(setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_BPF, &prog_fd,
> + sizeof(prog_fd)) == 0);
>
> f = popen("ping -4 -c5 localhost", "r");
> (void) f;
> @@ -34,13 +36,13 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
> int key;
>
> key = IPPROTO_TCP;
> - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd[0], &key, &tcp_cnt) == 0);
> + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &key, &tcp_cnt) == 0);
>
> key = IPPROTO_UDP;
> - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd[0], &key, &udp_cnt) == 0);
> + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &key, &udp_cnt) == 0);
>
> key = IPPROTO_ICMP;
> - assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd[0], &key, &icmp_cnt) == 0);
> + assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &key, &icmp_cnt) == 0);
>
> printf("TCP %lld UDP %lld ICMP %lld bytes\n",
> tcp_cnt, udp_cnt, icmp_cnt);
> diff --git a/samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c b/samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c
> index 125ee6efc913..e3611dbfce97 100644
> --- a/samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c
> +++ b/samples/bpf/sockex2_user.c
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
> #include <assert.h>
> #include <linux/bpf.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf.h>
> -#include "bpf_load.h"
> +#include "bpf/libbpf.h"
> #include "sock_example.h"
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <arpa/inet.h>
> @@ -17,22 +17,24 @@ struct pair {
> int main(int ac, char **argv)
> {
> struct rlimit r = {RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY};
> + struct bpf_object *obj;
> + int map_fd, prog_fd;
> char filename[256];
> - FILE *f;
> int i, sock;
> + FILE *f;
>
> snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s_kern.o", argv[0]);
> setrlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK, &r);
>
> - if (load_bpf_file(filename)) {
> - printf("%s", bpf_log_buf);
> + if (bpf_prog_load(filename, 0, &obj, &prog_fd))
> return 1;
> - }
> +
> + map_fd = bpf_object__find_map_fd_by_name(obj, "hash_map");
>
> sock = open_raw_sock("lo");
>
> - assert(setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_BPF, prog_fd,
> - sizeof(prog_fd[0])) == 0);
> + assert(setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_BPF, &prog_fd,
> + sizeof(prog_fd)) == 0);
>
> f = popen("ping -4 -c5 localhost", "r");
> (void) f;
> @@ -41,8 +43,8 @@ int main(int ac, char **argv)
> int key = 0, next_key;
> struct pair value;
>
> - while (bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd[0], &key, &next_key) == 0) {
> - bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd[0], &next_key, &value);
> + while (bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, &key, &next_key) == 0) {
> + bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &next_key, &value);
> printf("ip %s bytes %lld packets %lld\n",
> inet_ntoa((struct in_addr){htonl(next_key)}),
> value.bytes, value.packets);
> --
> 2.19.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists