Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZRHJQEC7Z8JReDeoa1w3DV9dtq-pajOA_RFGYucaRU=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 28 Feb 2019 11:07:02 -0800
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Cc:     Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        "acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] btf: fix bug with resolving STRUCT/UNION
 into corresponding FWD

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:19 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/27/19 2:46 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > When checking available canonical candidates for struct/union algorithm
> > utilizes btf_dedup_is_equiv to determine if candidate is suitable. This
> > check is not enough when candidate is corresponding FWD for that
> > struct/union, because according to equivalence logic they are
> > equivalent. When it so happens that FWD and STRUCT/UNION end in hashing
> > to the same bucket, it's possible to create remapping loop from FWD to
> > STRUCT and STRUCT to same FWD, which will cause btf_dedup() to loop
> > forever.
> >
> > This patch fixes the issue by additionally checking that type and
> > canonical candidate are strictly equal (utilizing btf_equal_struct).
>
> It looks like btf_equal_struct() checking equality except
> member type id's. Maybe calling it btf_almost_equal_struct() or
> something like that?

Yes, for struct/union we can't compare types directly, that's what
btf_dedup_is_equiv is doing. I think btf_equal_struct w/ comment
explaining this particular behavior is good enough. If you insist,
though, I'd rather go to something like btf_shallow_equal_struct or
something along those lines.

>
> >
> > Fixes: d5caef5b5655 ("btf: add BTF types deduplication algorithm")
> > Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> > ---
> >   tools/lib/bpf/btf.c | 6 +++++-
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > index 6bbb710216e6..53db26d158c9 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/btf.c
> > @@ -2255,7 +2255,7 @@ static void btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map(struct btf_dedup *d)
> >   static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
> >   {
> >       struct btf_dedup_node *cand_node;
> > -     struct btf_type *t;
> > +     struct btf_type *cand_type, *t;
> >       /* if we don't find equivalent type, then we are canonical */
> >       __u32 new_id = type_id;
> >       __u16 kind;
> > @@ -2275,6 +2275,10 @@ static int btf_dedup_struct_type(struct btf_dedup *d, __u32 type_id)
> >       for_each_dedup_cand(d, h, cand_node) {
> >               int eq;
> >
> > +             cand_type = d->btf->types[cand_node->type_id];
> > +             if (!btf_equal_struct(t, cand_type))
>
> The comment for this btf_equal_struct is not quite right.
> /*
>   * Check structural compatibility of two FUNC_PROTOs, ignoring
> referenced type
>   * IDs. This check is performed during type graph equivalence check and
>   * referenced types equivalence is checked separately.
>   */
> static bool btf_equal_struct(struct btf_type *t1, struct btf_type *t2)
>
> It should be two "struct/union types".

Yep, good catch, will fix!

>
> > +                     continue;
> > +
>
> I did not trace the algorithm how infinite loop happens. But the above

Check the test in follow up patch. It has a minimal example that
triggers this bug. It happens when we have some FWD x, which we
discover that it should be resolved to some STRUCT x (as a result of
equivalence check/resolution of some other struct s, that references
struct x internally). But that struct x might not have been
deduplicated yet, we just record this FWD -> STRUCT mapping so that we
don't lose this connection. Later, once we get to deduplication of
struct x, FWD x will be (in case of hash collision) one possible
candidate to consider for deduplication. At that point,
btf_dedup_is_equiv will consider them equivalent (but they are not
equal (!), that's where the bug is), so we'll try to resolve STRUCT x
-> FWD x, which creates a loop.

In btf_dedup_merge_hypot_map() that is used to record discovered
"equivalences" during struct/union type graph equivalence check, we
have explicit check to never resolve STRUCT/UNION into equivalent FWD,
so such loop shouldn't happen, except I missed the case of having FWD
as a possible dedup candidate due to hash collision.

> change is certainly a correct one, you want to do deduplication only
> after everything else (except member types) are euqal?

Well, if not for special case of FWD == STRUCT/UNION when
deduplicating structs, btf_dedup_is_equiv would be enough, because it
already checks for btf_equal_struct internally, when both types are
struct/union. It's just the special bit at the beginning of is_equiv
check that allows FWD and STRUCT/UNION with the same name to be
declared equivalent, that throws this off.

>
> If the bug is due to circle in struct->fwd and fwd->struct mappings,
> maybe a simple check whether such circle exists or not before update
> the mapping will also work? I am not proposing this fix, but want
> to understand better the issue.

That's essentially what we use btf_equal_struct for here, really. We
could equivalently just check BTF_INFO_KIND(t) == BTF_INFO_KIND(cand)
explicitly, but I btf_equal_struct feels a bit more generic and
obviously correct.

>
>
>
>
> >               btf_dedup_clear_hypot_map(d);
> >               eq = btf_dedup_is_equiv(d, type_id, cand_node->type_id);
> >               if (eq < 0)
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists