netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] samples: bpf: use libbpf where easy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:21:44 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] samples: bpf: use libbpf where easy

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 16:05:45 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >         if (object) {
> > -               assert(!load_bpf_file((char *)object));
> > -               return prog_fd[0];
> > +               assert(!bpf_prog_load(object, 0, &obj, &prog_fd));  
> 
> Here and in few more places below: is it possible to specify correct
> bpf_prog_type instead of 0?

Some of them yes, some of them no.  There are objects with multiple
program types IIRC.  This program type argument is only used for
checking if kernel versions are needed, and they are provided in
samples so it doesn't matter.

I'll try to add where possible.