| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190301200848.9534-4-saeedm@mellanox.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 12:08:34 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net-next 03/17] net/mlx5e: Don't make internal use of errno to denote missing neigh
From: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
EAGAIN is treated as a specific case when we consider the attachment
successful but wait for neigh event before offloading the flow.
This can result in unwanted behavior when sub calls on the offloading
path will return EAGAIN and we pass this error up.
Instead of attaching to a specific error code return a boolean value
from the attach encap operation saying if the encap is valid or not.
Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
.../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c | 8 ++++--
.../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 28 +++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c
index bdcc5e79328d..03e5d0d8fd8f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c
@@ -295,7 +295,9 @@ int mlx5e_tc_tun_create_header_ipv4(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
if (!(nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
neigh_event_send(n, NULL);
- err = -EAGAIN;
+ /* the encap entry will be made valid on neigh update event
+ * and not used before that.
+ */
goto out;
}
@@ -408,7 +410,9 @@ int mlx5e_tc_tun_create_header_ipv6(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
if (!(nud_state & NUD_VALID)) {
neigh_event_send(n, NULL);
- err = -EAGAIN;
+ /* the encap entry will be made valid on neigh update event
+ * and not used before that.
+ */
goto out;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index 7a363e44ec45..ea39083b1596 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -854,7 +854,8 @@ static int mlx5e_attach_encap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct net_device *mirred_dev,
int out_index,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- struct net_device **encap_dev);
+ struct net_device **encap_dev,
+ bool *encap_valid);
static struct mlx5_flow_handle *
mlx5e_tc_offload_fdb_rules(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
@@ -940,7 +941,8 @@ mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct mlx5_fc *counter = NULL;
struct mlx5e_rep_priv *rpriv;
struct mlx5e_priv *out_priv;
- int err = 0, encap_err = 0;
+ bool encap_valid = true;
+ int err = 0;
int out_index;
if (!mlx5_eswitch_prios_supported(esw) && attr->prio != 1) {
@@ -970,11 +972,10 @@ mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
out_dev = __dev_get_by_index(dev_net(priv->netdev),
mirred_ifindex);
err = mlx5e_attach_encap(priv, flow, out_dev, out_index,
- extack, &encap_dev);
- if (err && err != -EAGAIN)
+ extack, &encap_dev, &encap_valid);
+ if (err)
goto err_attach_encap;
- if (err == -EAGAIN)
- encap_err = err;
+
out_priv = netdev_priv(encap_dev);
rpriv = out_priv->ppriv;
attr->dests[out_index].rep = rpriv->rep;
@@ -1002,10 +1003,11 @@ mlx5e_tc_add_fdb_flow(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
attr->counter = counter;
}
- /* we get here if (1) there's no error or when
- * (2) there's an encap action and we're on -EAGAIN (no valid neigh)
+ /* we get here if one of the following takes place:
+ * (1) there's no error
+ * (2) there's an encap action and we don't have valid neigh
*/
- if (encap_err == -EAGAIN) {
+ if (!encap_valid) {
/* continue with goto slow path rule instead */
struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr slow_attr;
@@ -2343,7 +2345,8 @@ static int mlx5e_attach_encap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
struct net_device *mirred_dev,
int out_index,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
- struct net_device **encap_dev)
+ struct net_device **encap_dev,
+ bool *encap_valid)
{
struct mlx5_eswitch *esw = priv->mdev->priv.eswitch;
struct mlx5_esw_flow_attr *attr = flow->esw_attr;
@@ -2391,7 +2394,7 @@ static int mlx5e_attach_encap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
else if (family == AF_INET6)
err = mlx5e_tc_tun_create_header_ipv6(priv, mirred_dev, e);
- if (err && err != -EAGAIN)
+ if (err)
goto out_err;
hash_add_rcu(esw->offloads.encap_tbl, &e->encap_hlist, hash_key);
@@ -2403,8 +2406,9 @@ static int mlx5e_attach_encap(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
if (e->flags & MLX5_ENCAP_ENTRY_VALID) {
attr->dests[out_index].encap_id = e->encap_id;
attr->dests[out_index].flags |= MLX5_ESW_DEST_ENCAP_VALID;
+ *encap_valid = true;
} else {
- err = -EAGAIN;
+ *encap_valid = false;
}
return err;
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists