netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/7] selftests: bpf: break up test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 2 Mar 2019 11:16:12 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/7] selftests: bpf: break up test_progs

On Fri, Mar 01, 2019 at 07:42:12PM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Recently we had linux-next bpf/bpf-next conflict when we added new
> functionality to the test_progs.c at the same location. Let's split
> test_progs.c the same way we recently split test_verifier.c.
> 
> I follow the same patten we did in commit 2dfb40121ee8 ("selftests: bpf:
> prepare for break up of verifier tests") for verifier: create
> scaffolding to support dedicated files and slowly move the tests into
> separate files.
> 
> The first patch adds scaffolding, subsequent patches move progs into
> separate files.
> 
> In theory, many of the standalone tests can be migrated to this new
> framework as well. They get the benefit of common CHECK macro and
> bpf_find_map function which a lot of standalone tests need to redefine.
> 
> v3 changes:
> * respin on top of commit ebace0e981b2 ("selftests/bpf: use
>   __bpf_constant_htons in test_prog.c for flow dissector")
> * put bpf_rlimit.h into test_progs.c instead of test_progs.h
> 
> v2 changes:
> * added cover letter, added more description about file structure

Applied, Thanks