lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 2 Mar 2019 00:48:57 +0000
From:   Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To:     Martin Lau <kafai@...com>
CC:     Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix bpf_tcp_sock and bpf_sk_fullsock
 issue related to bpf_sk_release



> On Mar 1, 2019, at 11:49 AM, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com> wrote:
> 
> Lorenz Bauer [thanks!] reported that a ptr returned by bpf_tcp_sock(sk)
> can still be accessed after bpf_sk_release(sk).
> Both bpf_tcp_sock() and bpf_sk_fullsock() have the same issue.
> This patch addresses them together.
> 
> A simple reproducer looks like this:
> 
> sk = bpf_sk_lookup_tcp();
> /* if (!sk) ... */
> tp = bpf_tcp_sock(sk);
> /* if (!tp) ... */
> bpf_sk_release(sk);
> snd_cwnd = tp->snd_cwnd; /* oops! The verifier does not complain. */
> 
> The problem is the verifier did not scrub the register's states of
> the tcp_sock ptr (tp) after bpf_sk_release(sk).
> 
> [ Note that when calling bpf_tcp_sock(sk), the sk is not always
>  refcount-acquired. e.g. bpf_tcp_sock(skb->sk). The verifier works
>  fine for this case. ]
> 
> Currently, the verifier does not track if a helper's return ptr (in REG_0)
> is "carry"-ing one of its argument's refcount status. To carry this info,
> the reg1->id needs to be stored in reg0.  The reg0->id has already
> been used for NULL checking purpose.  Hence, a new "refcount_id"
> is needed in "struct bpf_reg_state".
> 
> With refcount_id, when bpf_sk_release(sk) is called, the verifier can scrub
> all reg states which has a refcount_id match.  It is done with the changes
> in release_reg_references().
> 
> When acquiring and releasing a refcount, the reg->id is still used.
> Hence, we cannot do "bpf_sk_release(tp)" in the above reproducer
> example.
> 
> Misc change notes:
> - With the new refcount_id, reg_is_refcounted() test can now be
>  done with "reg->refcount_id && reg->id == reg->refcount_id" instead of
>  testing the ptr type.
> 
>  The type_is_refcounted() and type_is_refcounted_or_null()
>  are no longer needed, so removed.
> 
> - An anonymous struct is added to bpf_call_arg_meta to store
>  the reg->id and reg->refcount_id of the arg.  Otherwise,
>  they will be unavailable after check_helper_call()
>  has cleared all CALLER_SAVED_REGS.
> 
> - The check_func_arg() can only allow one refcount-ed arg.  It is
>  guaranteed by check_refcount_ok() which ensures at most one arg can be
>  refcount-ed.  Hence, it is a verifier internal error if >1 refcount arg
>  found in check_func_arg().
> 
> - The check_func_arg() also complains if a "is_acquire_function(func_id)"
>  helper is having a refcount-ed arg.  No func_id is doing this now
>  and should have been rejected earlier, so it is treated as
>  verifier internal error also.
> 
> - In check_func_arg(), the "!reg->id" check is removed under
>  the ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET case.  It is because a PTR_TO_SOCKET
>  can be obtained from bpf_sk_fullsock() and it does not
>  take a refcount.  The verifier will still complain during
>  release_reference() but it does not treat it as a
>  verifier internal error anymore.
> 
> - In release_reference(), release_reference_state() is called
>  first to ensure a match on "reg->id" can be found before
>  scrubbing the reg states with release_reg_references().
> 
> Fixes: 655a51e536c0 ("bpf: Add struct bpf_tcp_sock and BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock")
> Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
> Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>

> ---
> include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  9 ++++
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> index 69f7a3449eda..b7698d0534cb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,15 @@ struct bpf_reg_state {
> 	 * same reference to the socket, to determine proper reference freeing.
> 	 */
> 	u32 id;
> +	/* For PTR_TO_SOCKET and PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK, this ptr may not actually
> +	 * hold a refcount of a socket but instead it is a ptr
> +	 * returned from a helper which is based on its refcount-ed
> +	 * ptr argument (e.g. bpf_tcp_sock()).
> +	 * "refcount_id" stores which refcount-ed argument it
> +	 * originally derived from.  When this original argument's
> +	 * refcount is released, this ptr will also be invalidated.
> +	 */
> +	u32 refcount_id;
> 	/* For scalar types (SCALAR_VALUE), this represents our knowledge of
> 	 * the actual value.
> 	 * For pointer types, this represents the variable part of the offset
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 1b9496c41383..d9cf7963f006 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,10 @@ struct bpf_call_arg_meta {
> 	int access_size;
> 	s64 msize_smax_value;
> 	u64 msize_umax_value;
> -	int ptr_id;
> +	struct {
> +		int id;
> +		int refcount_id;
> +	} refcount_reg;
> 	int func_id;
> };
> 
> @@ -346,19 +349,9 @@ static bool reg_type_may_be_null(enum bpf_reg_type type)
> 	       type == PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL;
> }
> 
> -static bool type_is_refcounted(enum bpf_reg_type type)
> -{
> -	return type == PTR_TO_SOCKET;
> -}
> -
> -static bool type_is_refcounted_or_null(enum bpf_reg_type type)
> -{
> -	return type == PTR_TO_SOCKET || type == PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL;
> -}
> -
> static bool reg_is_refcounted(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
> {
> -	return type_is_refcounted(reg->type);
> +	return reg->refcount_id && reg->id == reg->refcount_id;
> }
> 
> static bool reg_may_point_to_spin_lock(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
> @@ -367,14 +360,10 @@ static bool reg_may_point_to_spin_lock(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
> 		map_value_has_spin_lock(reg->map_ptr);
> }
> 
> -static bool reg_is_refcounted_or_null(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
> -{
> -	return type_is_refcounted_or_null(reg->type);
> -}
> -
> static bool arg_type_is_refcounted(enum bpf_arg_type type)
> {
> -	return type == ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET;
> +	return type == ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET ||
> +		type == ARG_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON;
> }
> 
> /* Determine whether the function releases some resources allocated by another
> @@ -392,6 +381,12 @@ static bool is_acquire_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
> 		func_id == BPF_FUNC_sk_lookup_udp;
> }
> 
> +static bool is_refcount_carrying_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
> +{
> +	return func_id == BPF_FUNC_tcp_sock ||
> +		func_id == BPF_FUNC_sk_fullsock;
> +}
> +
> /* string representation of 'enum bpf_reg_type' */
> static const char * const reg_type_str[] = {
> 	[NOT_INIT]		= "?",
> @@ -465,7 +460,8 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> 			if (t == PTR_TO_STACK)
> 				verbose(env, ",call_%d", func(env, reg)->callsite);
> 		} else {
> -			verbose(env, "(id=%d", reg->id);
> +			verbose(env, "(id=%d refcount_id=%d", reg->id,
> +				reg->refcount_id);
> 			if (t != SCALAR_VALUE)
> 				verbose(env, ",off=%d", reg->off);
> 			if (type_is_pkt_pointer(t))
> @@ -2418,12 +2414,6 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
> 		expected_type = PTR_TO_SOCKET;
> 		if (type != expected_type)
> 			goto err_type;
> -		if (meta->ptr_id || !reg->id) {
> -			verbose(env, "verifier internal error: mismatched references meta=%d, reg=%d\n",
> -				meta->ptr_id, reg->id);
> -			return -EFAULT;
> -		}
> -		meta->ptr_id = reg->id;
> 	} else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK) {
> 		if (meta->func_id == BPF_FUNC_spin_lock) {
> 			if (process_spin_lock(env, regno, true))
> @@ -2532,6 +2522,26 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
> 					      zero_size_allowed, meta);
> 	}
> 
> +	if (reg->refcount_id) {
> +		if (meta->refcount_reg.refcount_id) {
> +			verbose(env, "verifier internal error: more than one arg with refcount_id R%d %u %u\n",
> +				regno, reg->refcount_id,
> +				meta->refcount_reg.refcount_id);
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (is_acquire_function(meta->func_id)) {
> +			verbose(env,
> +				"verifier internal error: func %s#%d taking an already refcount-ed arg R%d\n",
> +				func_id_name(meta->func_id), meta->func_id,
> +				regno);
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		}
> +
> +		meta->refcount_reg.id = reg->id;
> +		meta->refcount_reg.refcount_id = reg->refcount_id;
> +	}
> +
> 	return err;
> err_type:
> 	verbose(env, "R%d type=%s expected=%s\n", regno,
> @@ -2805,13 +2815,13 @@ static void release_reg_references(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> 	int i;
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
> -		if (regs[i].id == id)
> +		if (regs[i].refcount_id == id)
> 			mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, i);
> 
> 	bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(i, state, reg) {
> 		if (!reg)
> 			continue;
> -		if (reg_is_refcounted(reg) && reg->id == id)
> +		if (reg->refcount_id == id)
> 			__mark_reg_unknown(reg);
> 	}
> }
> @@ -2819,16 +2829,20 @@ static void release_reg_references(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> /* The pointer with the specified id has released its reference to kernel
>  * resources. Identify all copies of the same pointer and clear the reference.
>  */
> -static int release_reference(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> -			     struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta)
> +static int release_reference(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int id)
> {
> 	struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state;
> +	int err;
> 	int i;
> 
> +	err = release_reference_state(cur_func(env), id);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> 	for (i = 0; i <= vstate->curframe; i++)
> -		release_reg_references(env, vstate->frame[i], meta->ptr_id);
> +		release_reg_references(env, vstate->frame[i], id);
> 
> -	return release_reference_state(cur_func(env), meta->ptr_id);
> +	return 0;
> }
> 
> static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
> @@ -3093,7 +3107,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn
> 			return err;
> 		}
> 	} else if (is_release_function(func_id)) {
> -		err = release_reference(env, &meta);
> +		err = release_reference(env, meta.refcount_reg.id);
> 		if (err) {
> 			verbose(env, "func %s#%d reference has not been acquired before\n",
> 				func_id_name(func_id), func_id);
> @@ -3156,6 +3170,7 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn
> 				return id;
> 			/* For release_reference() */
> 			regs[BPF_REG_0].id = id;
> +			regs[BPF_REG_0].refcount_id = id;
> 		} else {
> 			/* For mark_ptr_or_null_reg() */
> 			regs[BPF_REG_0].id = ++env->id_gen;
> @@ -3170,6 +3185,9 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn
> 		return -EINVAL;
> 	}
> 
> +	if (is_refcount_carrying_function(func_id))
> +		regs[BPF_REG_0].refcount_id = meta.refcount_reg.refcount_id;
> +
> 	do_refine_retval_range(regs, fn->ret_type, func_id, &meta);
> 
> 	err = check_map_func_compatibility(env, meta.map_ptr, func_id);
> @@ -4687,8 +4705,8 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate, u32 regno,
> 	u32 id = regs[regno].id;
> 	int i, j;
> 
> -	if (reg_is_refcounted_or_null(&regs[regno]) && is_null)
> -		release_reference_state(state, id);
> +	if (reg_is_refcounted(&regs[regno]) && is_null)
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(release_reference_state(state, id));
> 
> 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++)
> 		mark_ptr_or_null_reg(state, &regs[i], id, is_null);
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ