lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:05:51 +0100 From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name> To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi83@...il.com>, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [mt76/mt7603/mac] Question about missing variable assignment On 2019-03-02 22:10, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Hi all, > > The following piece of code in drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7603/mac.c > is missing a variable assignment before line 1058. Notice that there > is a potential execution path in which variable *i* is compared against > magic number 15 at line 1075 without being initialized previously > (this was reported by Coverity): > > 1055 out: > 1056 final_rate_flags = info->status.rates[final_idx].flags; > 1057 > 1058 switch (FIELD_GET(MT_TX_RATE_MODE, final_rate)) { > 1059 case MT_PHY_TYPE_CCK: > 1060 cck = true; > 1061 /* fall through */ > 1062 case MT_PHY_TYPE_OFDM: > 1063 if (dev->mt76.chandef.chan->band == NL80211_BAND_5GHZ) > 1064 sband = &dev->mt76.sband_5g.sband; > 1065 else > 1066 sband = &dev->mt76.sband_2g.sband; > 1067 final_rate &= GENMASK(5, 0); > 1068 final_rate = mt7603_get_rate(dev, sband, final_rate, cck); > 1069 final_rate_flags = 0; > 1070 break; > 1071 case MT_PHY_TYPE_HT_GF: > 1072 case MT_PHY_TYPE_HT: > 1073 final_rate_flags |= IEEE80211_TX_RC_MCS; > 1074 final_rate &= GENMASK(5, 0); > 1075 if (i > 15) > 1076 return false; > 1077 break; > 1078 default: > 1079 return false; > 1080 } > > My guess is that such missing assignment should be something similar > to the one at line 566: > > i = FIELD_GET(MT_RXV1_TX_RATE, rxdg0); > > but I'm not sure what the proper arguments for macro FIELD_GET should > be. > > This code was introduced by commit c8846e1015022d2531ac4c895783e400b3e5babe > > What do you think? Thanks for reporting this. The fix is simpler than that, the check should be: if (final_rate > 15) I will send a fix. - Felix
Powered by blists - more mailing lists