lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 4 Mar 2019 09:04:06 +0800
From:   Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
To:     Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        "gerlitz.or@...il.com" <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/mlx5: Avoid panic when setting vport mac, getting
 vport config

On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 8:42 PM Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/03/2019 11:56, xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> >
> > If we try to set VFs mac address on a VF (not PF) net device,
> > the kernel will be crash. The commands are show as below:
> >
> > $ echo 2 > /sys/class/net/$MLX_PF0/device/sriov_numvfs
> > $ ip link set $MLX_VF0 vf 0 mac 00:11:22:33:44:00
> >
> > [exception RIP: mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_mac+41]
> > [ffffb8b7079e3688] do_setlink at ffffffff8f67f85b
> > [ffffb8b7079e37a8] __rtnl_newlink at ffffffff8f683778
> > [ffffb8b7079e3b68] rtnl_newlink at ffffffff8f683a63
> > [ffffb8b7079e3b90] rtnetlink_rcv_msg at ffffffff8f67d812
> > [ffffb8b7079e3c10] netlink_rcv_skb at ffffffff8f6b88ab
> > [ffffb8b7079e3c60] netlink_unicast at ffffffff8f6b808f
> > [ffffb8b7079e3ca0] netlink_sendmsg at ffffffff8f6b8412
> > [ffffb8b7079e3d18] sock_sendmsg at ffffffff8f6452f6
> > [ffffb8b7079e3d30] ___sys_sendmsg at ffffffff8f645860
> > [ffffb8b7079e3eb0] __sys_sendmsg at ffffffff8f647a38
> > [ffffb8b7079e3f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8f00401b
> > [ffffb8b7079e3f50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8f80008c
> >
> > and
> >
> > [exception RIP: mlx5_eswitch_get_vport_config+12]
> > [ffffa70607e57678] mlx5e_get_vf_config at ffffffffc03c7f8f [mlx5_core]
> > [ffffa70607e57688] do_setlink at ffffffffbc67fa59
> > [ffffa70607e577a8] __rtnl_newlink at ffffffffbc683778
> > [ffffa70607e57b68] rtnl_newlink at ffffffffbc683a63
> > [ffffa70607e57b90] rtnetlink_rcv_msg at ffffffffbc67d812
> > [ffffa70607e57c10] netlink_rcv_skb at ffffffffbc6b88ab
> > [ffffa70607e57c60] netlink_unicast at ffffffffbc6b808f
> > [ffffa70607e57ca0] netlink_sendmsg at ffffffffbc6b8412
> > [ffffa70607e57d18] sock_sendmsg at ffffffffbc6452f6
> > [ffffa70607e57d30] ___sys_sendmsg at ffffffffbc645860
> > [ffffa70607e57eb0] __sys_sendmsg at ffffffffbc647a38
> > [ffffa70607e57f38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffffbc00401b
> > [ffffa70607e57f50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffbc80008c
> >
> > Fixes: a8d70a054a718 ("net/mlx5: E-Switch, Disallow vlan/spoofcheck setup if not being esw manager")
> > Cc: Eli Cohen <eli@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > index 6cb9710..774edc9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
> > @@ -1871,6 +1871,9 @@ int mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_mac(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
> >       u64 node_guid;
> >       int err = 0;
> >
> > +     if (!ESW_ALLOWED(esw))
> > +             return -EPERM;
> > +
>
> this will introduce a bug with smart nic.
> from the commit in the fixes line, in smart nic the PF
> is not an esw manager so it will block changing vf mac
> with the pf. the fix should be checking if esw is null first.
Thanks for your reply, I don't get the smart nic card and can't test
it. So to fix this bug,
we only check the esw is null right ?

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
index 6cb9710..dc332ba 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
@@ -1871,6 +1871,9 @@ int mlx5_eswitch_set_vport_mac(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
        u64 node_guid;
        int err = 0;

+       if (!esw)
+               return -EPERM;
+
        if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vport_group_manager))
                return -EPERM;
        if (!LEGAL_VPORT(esw, vport) || is_multicast_ether_addr(mac))
@@ -1945,6 +1948,9 @@ int mlx5_eswitch_get_vport_config(struct
mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 {
        struct mlx5_vport *evport;

+       if (!esw)
+               return -EPERM;
+
        if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vport_group_manager))
                return -EPERM;
        if (!LEGAL_VPORT(esw, vport))

>
> >       if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vport_group_manager))
> >               return -EPERM;
> >       if (!LEGAL_VPORT(esw, vport) || is_multicast_ether_addr(mac))
> > @@ -1945,6 +1948,9 @@ int mlx5_eswitch_get_vport_config(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
> >  {
> >       struct mlx5_vport *evport;
> >
> > +     if (!ESW_ALLOWED(esw))
> > +             return -EPERM;
> > +
> >       if (!MLX5_CAP_GEN(esw->dev, vport_group_manager))
> >               return -EPERM;
> >       if (!LEGAL_VPORT(esw, vport))
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ