[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b82ebdf3-dc71-9815-6fe4-8a00aaa8f653@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 17:37:08 -0800
From: si-wei liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: liran.alon@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
vijay.balakrishna@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] failover: allow name change on IFF_UP slave
interfaces
Please disregard patch emails previously sent with similar subject. The
patch target is set to net rather than net-next. Any discussion or
comment around this patch should go after this email.
-Siwei
On 3/4/2019 4:53 PM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> When a netdev appears through hot plug then gets enslaved by a failover
> master that is already up and running, the slave will be opened
> right away after getting enslaved. Today there's a race that userspace
> (udev) may fail to rename the slave if the kernel (net_failover)
> opens the slave earlier than when the userspace rename happens.
> Unlike bond or team, the primary slave of failover can't be renamed by
> userspace ahead of time, since the kernel initiated auto-enslavement is
> unable to, or rather, is never meant to be synchronized with the rename
> request from userspace.
>
> As the failover slave interfaces are not designed to be operated
> directly by userspace apps: IP configuration, filter rules with
> regard to network traffic passing and etc., should all be done on master
> interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the
> name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long
> as admin users can see reliable names that may carry
> other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that
> "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a
> name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to.
>
> Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because
> there might be admin script or management software that is already
> relying on such behavior and assumes that the slave name can't be
> changed once UP. But failover is special: with the in-kernel
> auto-enslavement mechanism, the userspace expectation for device
> enumeration and bring-up order is already broken. Previously initramfs
> and various userspace config tools were modified to bypass failover
> slaves because of auto-enslavement and duplicate MAC address. Similarly,
> in case that users care about seeing reliable slave name, the new type
> of failover slaves needs to be taken care of specifically in userspace
> anyway.
>
> For that to work, now introduce a module-level tunable,
> "slave_rename_ok" that allows users to lift up the rename restriction on
> failover slave which is already UP. Although it's possible this change
> potentially break userspace component (most likely configuration scripts
> or management software) that assumes slave name can't be changed while
> UP, it's relatively a limited and controllable set among all userspace
> components, which can be fixed specifically to work with the new naming
> behavior of the failover slave. Userspace component interacting with
> slaves should be changed to operate on failover master instead, as the
> failover slave is dynamic in nature which may come and go at any point.
> The goal is to make the role of failover slaves less relevant, and
> all userspace should only deal with master in the long run. The default
> for the "slave_rename_ok" is set to true(1). If userspace doesn't have
> the right support in place meanwhile users don't care about reliable
> userspace naming, the value can be set to false(0).
>
> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei.Liu@...cle.com
> Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 +++
> net/core/dev.c | 3 ++-
> net/core/failover.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index 857f8ab..6d9e4e0 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1487,6 +1487,7 @@ struct net_device_ops {
> * @IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER: device doesn't support the rx_handler hook
> * @IFF_FAILOVER: device is a failover master device
> * @IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE: device is lower dev of a failover master device
> + * @IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK: rename is allowed while slave device is running
> */
> enum netdev_priv_flags {
> IFF_802_1Q_VLAN = 1<<0,
> @@ -1518,6 +1519,7 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
> IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER = 1<<26,
> IFF_FAILOVER = 1<<27,
> IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE = 1<<28,
> + IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK = 1<<29,
> };
>
> #define IFF_802_1Q_VLAN IFF_802_1Q_VLAN
> @@ -1548,6 +1550,7 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
> #define IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER
> #define IFF_FAILOVER IFF_FAILOVER
> #define IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE
> +#define IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK
>
> /**
> * struct net_device - The DEVICE structure.
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 722d50d..ae070de 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -1180,7 +1180,8 @@ int dev_change_name(struct net_device *dev, const char *newname)
> BUG_ON(!dev_net(dev));
>
> net = dev_net(dev);
> - if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
> + if (dev->flags & IFF_UP &&
> + !(dev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> write_seqcount_begin(&devnet_rename_seq);
> diff --git a/net/core/failover.c b/net/core/failover.c
> index 4a92a98..1fd8bbb 100644
> --- a/net/core/failover.c
> +++ b/net/core/failover.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
>
> static LIST_HEAD(failover_list);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(failover_lock);
> +static bool slave_rename_ok = true;
> +
> +module_param(slave_rename_ok, bool, (S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR));
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(slave_rename_ok,
> + "If set allow renaming the slave when failover master is up");
>
> static struct net_device *failover_get_bymac(u8 *mac, struct failover_ops **ops)
> {
> @@ -81,13 +86,15 @@ static int failover_slave_register(struct net_device *slave_dev)
> }
>
> slave_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE;
> + if (slave_rename_ok)
> + slave_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK;
>
> if (fops && fops->slave_register &&
> !fops->slave_register(slave_dev, failover_dev))
> return NOTIFY_OK;
>
> netdev_upper_dev_unlink(slave_dev, failover_dev);
> - slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE;
> + slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~(IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE | IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK);
> err_upper_link:
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
> done:
> @@ -121,7 +128,7 @@ int failover_slave_unregister(struct net_device *slave_dev)
>
> netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
> netdev_upper_dev_unlink(slave_dev, failover_dev);
> - slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE;
> + slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~(IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE | IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK);
>
> if (fops && fops->slave_unregister &&
> !fops->slave_unregister(slave_dev, failover_dev))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists