[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190306232526.219483-1-sdf@google.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:25:26 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf] selftests: bpf: test_progs: initialize duration in
singal_pending test
CHECK macro implicitly uses duration. We call CHECK() a couple of times
before duration is initialized from bpf_prog_test_run().
Explicitly set duration to 0 to avoid compiler warnings.
Fixes: 740f8a657221 ("selftests/bpf: make sure signal interrupts BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN")
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c
index f2a37bbf91ab..996e808f43a2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/signal_pending.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ static void test_signal_pending_by_type(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type)
struct itimerval timeo = {
.it_value.tv_usec = 100000, /* 100ms */
};
- __u32 duration, retval;
+ __u32 duration = 0, retval;
int prog_fd;
int err;
int i;
--
2.21.0.352.gf09ad66450-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists