[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdk3iedWAbKOTR2UvQn-JLMZuU4_Jz6J=rDdjz0=_tNAGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:54:19 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com,
joabreu@...opsys.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: Avoid sometimes uninitialized Clang warnings
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 9:49 AM David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> From: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:21:01 -0700
>
> > @@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static int stmmac_hwtstamp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr)
> > u32 ts_master_en = 0;
> > u32 ts_event_en = 0;
> > u32 value = 0;
> > - u32 sec_inc;
> > + u32 sec_inc = 0;
> > bool xmac;
>
> Please don't break the reverse christmas tree ordering here, thank you.
Every codebase has its own unique code style. *wonders how
clang-format could or could not handle that rule*
Thanks for sending the patch Nathan; if you could resend with the
declaration order changed so that the line width decreases going down
in the order, you can add my Reviewed-by tag.
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists