lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c468d59a-b754-e7e5-7811-b13fbb824970@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Mar 2019 20:54:44 -0800
From:   si-wei liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>
To:     "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc:     liran.alon@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
        vijay.balakrishna@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] failover: allow name change on IFF_UP slave
 interfaces



On 3/6/2019 8:13 PM, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>
> On 3/6/2019 7:08 PM, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
>> When a netdev appears through hot plug then gets enslaved by a failover
>> master that is already up and running, the slave will be opened
>> right away after getting enslaved. Today there's a race that userspace
>> (udev) may fail to rename the slave if the kernel (net_failover)
>> opens the slave earlier than when the userspace rename happens.
>> Unlike bond or team, the primary slave of failover can't be renamed by
>> userspace ahead of time, since the kernel initiated auto-enslavement is
>> unable to, or rather, is never meant to be synchronized with the rename
>> request from userspace.
>>
>> As the failover slave interfaces are not designed to be operated
>> directly by userspace apps: IP configuration, filter rules with
>> regard to network traffic passing and etc., should all be done on master
>> interface. In general, userspace apps only care about the
>> name of master interface, while slave names are less important as long
>> as admin users can see reliable names that may carry
>> other information describing the netdev. For e.g., they can infer that
>> "ens3nsby" is a standby slave of "ens3", while for a
>> name like "eth0" they can't tell which master it belongs to.
>>
>> Historically the name of IFF_UP interface can't be changed because
>> there might be admin script or management software that is already
>> relying on such behavior and assumes that the slave name can't be
>> changed once UP. But failover is special: with the in-kernel
>> auto-enslavement mechanism, the userspace expectation for device
>> enumeration and bring-up order is already broken. Previously initramfs
>> and various userspace config tools were modified to bypass failover
>> slaves because of auto-enslavement and duplicate MAC address. Similarly,
>> in case that users care about seeing reliable slave name, the new type
>> of failover slaves needs to be taken care of specifically in userspace
>> anyway.
>>
>> It's less risky to lift up the rename restriction on failover slave
>> which is already UP. Although it's possible this change may potentially
>> break userspace component (most likely configuration scripts or
>> management software) that assumes slave name can't be changed while
>> UP, it's relatively a limited and controllable set among all userspace
>> components, which can be fixed specifically to work with the new naming
>> behavior of failover slaves. Userspace component interacting with
>> slaves should be changed to operate on failover master instead, as the
>> failover slave is dynamic in nature which may come and go at any point.
>> The goal is to make the role of failover slaves less relevant, and
>> all userspace should only deal with master in the long run.
>>
>> Fixes: 30c8bd5aa8b2 ("net: Introduce generic failover module")
>> Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>
>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
>>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - Drop configurable module parameter (Sridhar)
>>
>>
>>   include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 +++
>>   net/core/dev.c            | 3 ++-
>>   net/core/failover.c       | 6 +++---
>>   3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index 857f8ab..6d9e4e0 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -1487,6 +1487,7 @@ struct net_device_ops {
>>    * @IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER: device doesn't support the rx_handler hook
>>    * @IFF_FAILOVER: device is a failover master device
>>    * @IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE: device is lower dev of a failover master 
>> device
>> + * @IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK: rename is allowed while slave device is 
>> running
>>    */
>>   enum netdev_priv_flags {
>>       IFF_802_1Q_VLAN            = 1<<0,
>> @@ -1518,6 +1519,7 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
>>       IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER        = 1<<26,
>>       IFF_FAILOVER            = 1<<27,
>>       IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE        = 1<<28,
>> +    IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK        = 1<<29,
>>   };
>>     #define IFF_802_1Q_VLAN            IFF_802_1Q_VLAN
>> @@ -1548,6 +1550,7 @@ enum netdev_priv_flags {
>>   #define IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER        IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER
>>   #define IFF_FAILOVER            IFF_FAILOVER
>>   #define IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE        IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE
>> +#define IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK        IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK
>>     /**
>>    *    struct net_device - The DEVICE structure.
>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>> index 722d50d..ae070de 100644
>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>> @@ -1180,7 +1180,8 @@ int dev_change_name(struct net_device *dev, 
>> const char *newname)
>>       BUG_ON(!dev_net(dev));
>>         net = dev_net(dev);
>> -    if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
>> +    if (dev->flags & IFF_UP &&
>> +        !(dev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK))
>>           return -EBUSY;
>
> Without the configurable module parameter, i think we don't even need
> the new SLAVE_RENAME_OK private flag.
> Can't we simply check for IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE ?
I'd prefer keeping this flag for now, even though without configurable 
module parameter. This has clear semantics that helps decouple behavior 
against specific link type, and may benefit other auto-enslaved netdevs 
as well.

-Siwei

>
>> write_seqcount_begin(&devnet_rename_seq);
>> diff --git a/net/core/failover.c b/net/core/failover.c
>> index 4a92a98..34c5c87 100644
>> --- a/net/core/failover.c
>> +++ b/net/core/failover.c
>> @@ -80,14 +80,14 @@ static int failover_slave_register(struct 
>> net_device *slave_dev)
>>           goto err_upper_link;
>>       }
>>   -    slave_dev->priv_flags |= IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE;
>> +    slave_dev->priv_flags |= (IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE | 
>> IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK);
>>         if (fops && fops->slave_register &&
>>           !fops->slave_register(slave_dev, failover_dev))
>>           return NOTIFY_OK;
>>         netdev_upper_dev_unlink(slave_dev, failover_dev);
>> -    slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE;
>> +    slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~(IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE | 
>> IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK);
>>   err_upper_link:
>>       netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
>>   done:
>> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ int failover_slave_unregister(struct net_device 
>> *slave_dev)
>>         netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
>>       netdev_upper_dev_unlink(slave_dev, failover_dev);
>> -    slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE;
>> +    slave_dev->priv_flags &= ~(IFF_FAILOVER_SLAVE | 
>> IFF_SLAVE_RENAME_OK);
>>         if (fops && fops->slave_unregister &&
>>           !fops->slave_unregister(slave_dev, failover_dev))
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ