netdev - Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] can: m_can: Rename m_can_priv to m_can

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e85a4d42-2c96-a95c-e3bb-31a3c928a1f2@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Mar 2019 06:33:49 -0600
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>, <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] can: m_can: Rename m_can_priv to m_can_classdev

Wolfgang

On 3/8/19 4:25 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 05.03.19 um 16:52 schrieb Dan Murphy:
>> Rename the common m_can_priv class structure to
>> m_can_classdev as this is more descriptive.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>> ---
>>
>> v7 - Fixed remaining checkpatch issues, renamed priv to cdev - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1047219/
>>
>> v6 - No changes only rebase changes possibly can squash into the first patch - 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1042444/
>>
>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c          | 524 ++++++++++++-------------
>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h          |  28 +-
>>  drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_platform.c |  16 +-
>>  3 files changed, 284 insertions(+), 284 deletions(-)
> 
> ...snip...
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h
>> index b60f27dd9f33..1299cc747194 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.h
>> @@ -57,19 +57,19 @@ struct mram_cfg {
>>  	u8  num;
>>  };
>>  
>> -struct m_can_priv;
>> +struct m_can_classdev;
>>  struct m_can_ops {
>>  	/* Device specific call backs */
>> -	int (*clear_interrupts)(struct m_can_priv *m_can_class);
>> -	u32 (*read_reg)(struct m_can_priv *m_can_class, int reg);
>> -	int (*write_reg)(struct m_can_priv *m_can_class, int reg, int val);
>> -	u32 (*read_fifo)(struct m_can_priv *m_can_class, int addr_offset);
>> -	int (*write_fifo)(struct m_can_priv *m_can_class, int addr_offset,
>> +	int (*clear_interrupts)(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class);
>> +	u32 (*read_reg)(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int reg);
>> +	int (*write_reg)(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int reg, int val);
>> +	u32 (*read_fifo)(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int addr_offset);
>> +	int (*write_fifo)(struct m_can_classdev *m_can_class, int addr_offset,
> 
> Could you please replace the variable name "m_can_class" with "cdev"
> here and below and in "c_can_platform.c " and "tcan4x5x.c" as well.
> 

OK I will update the header

The tcan and m_can_platform source files are converted to cdev as opposed to m_can_class variable.

Dan

> Thanks,
> 
> Wolfgang.
> 


-- 
------------------
Dan Murphy