netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/8] aio: store event at final iocb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190311194431.GD12602@lst.de>
Date:   Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:44:31 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
        ktkhai@...tuozzo.com, kyeongdon.kim@....com,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, pabeni@...hat.com,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        zhengbin <zhengbin13@...wei.com>, bcrl@...ck.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
        houtao1@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] aio: store event at final iocb_put()

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 07:08:17AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> 
> Instead of having aio_complete() set ->ki_res.{res,res2}, do that
> explicitly in its callers, drop the reference (as aio_complete()
> used to do) and delay the rest until the final iocb_put().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> ---
>  fs/aio.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index 2249a7a1d6b3..b9c4c1894020 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -1077,24 +1077,10 @@ static inline void iocb_destroy(struct aio_kiocb *iocb)
>  	kmem_cache_free(kiocb_cachep, iocb);
>  }
>  
> -static inline void iocb_put(struct aio_kiocb *iocb)
> -{
> -	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&iocb->ki_refcnt))
> -		iocb_destroy(iocb);
> -}

Maybe iocb_put should just have been added in the place you move
it to in patch 1?