[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190311211851.GB4939@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:18:51 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"jolsa@...nel.org" <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"sdf@...ichev.me" <sdf@...ichev.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 perf,bpf 00/15] perf annotation of BPF programs
Em Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:08:31PM +0000, Song Liu escreveu:
> > On Mar 11, 2019, at 2:05 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com> wrote:
> > Em Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 09:01:48PM +0000, Song Liu escreveu:
> >>> On Mar 11, 2019, at 1:24 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>> These csets are already upstream, i.e. already hit torvalds/master, i.e.
> >>> will be in 5.1, can you check that we still need doing this
> >>> cherry-picking?
> >> I just checked that 02-15 of the set could apply to torvalds/master (with
> >> some minor conflicts), and it works as expected.
> > So no need to cherrypick, just use torvalds/master as a base, ok.
> Do you want me to resend the set with the conflict resolved?
No need for today, I think Jiri is looking at that branch I saw you guys
chatting today, so if he has some new comments, you can then address and
repost, fixing the conflicts then.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists