netdev - Re: [PATCH] Check for SKBTX_HW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD56B7eM1--nOv=kPvsLfcvhLeYpSM+pVyk3CDi5szx3hCXp_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:05:04 -0400
From:   Paul Thomas <pthomas8589@...il.com>
To:     "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check for SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP in macb driver

Hi Jake, thanks for all the help and for looking at this!

>
> You have two conditionals inside, and I misread where you were doing the checking of the SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP flag.
>
> I would do the following :
>
> if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_HWTSTAMP) &&
>     gem_ptp_do_txstamp(queue, skb, desc)) {
I guess I was thinking the call to gem_ptp_do_txstamp() could be
avoided in many cases, but either way is fine with me..
>   ....
> }
>
-Paul