lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:08:37 +0800
From:   linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <mingfangsen@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sit: fix UBSAN Undefined behaviour in check_6rd



On 2019/3/12 1:30, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
> 
>> From: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:29:32 +0800
>>
>>> @@ -778,8 +778,9 @@ static bool check_6rd(struct ip_tunnel *tunnel, const struct in6_addr *v6dst,
>>>  		pbw0 = tunnel->ip6rd.prefixlen >> 5;
>>>  		pbi0 = tunnel->ip6rd.prefixlen & 0x1f;
>>>
>>> -		d = (ntohl(v6dst->s6_addr32[pbw0]) << pbi0) >>
>>> -		    tunnel->ip6rd.relay_prefixlen;
>>> +		d = tunnel->ip6rd.relay_prefixlen < 32 ?
>>> +			(ntohl(v6dst->s6_addr32[pbw0]) << pbi0) >>
>>> +		    tunnel->ip6rd.relay_prefixlen : 0;
>>>
>>
>> I hate the fact that we have to guard against something which the rest
>> of the code makes sure NEVER EVER happens.
>>
>> Every assignment of ->relay_prefixlen is guarded by a check against 32.
> 
> Sorry, I now understand, it can equal 32.
> 
> I'll apply this, thank you.
> 
> .
> 

That's very nice of you. Thank you very much. I'am sorry for topping my reply in the previous email.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists