lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 14 Mar 2019 23:36:38 +0800
From:   Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        <ast@...nel.org>, "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        Zhaohongjiang <zhaohongjiang@...wei.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 979d63d50c0c0f7bc537bf821e056cc9fe5abd38 bpf: prevent out of
 bounds speculation on pointer arithmetic



On 2019/3/14 22:57, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 10:41:57PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2019/3/13 0:22, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:58:39PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2019/3/12 19:52, Greg KH wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 05:18:33PM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
>>>>>> Hi, Daniel & Greg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch (979d63d50c0c bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation on pointer
>>>>>> arithmetic) was assigned a CVE (CVE-2019-7308) with a high score:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> CVSS v3.0 Severity and Metrics:
>>>>>> Base Score: 9.8 CRITICAL
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And this patch is not in stable-4.4, would you please backport this patch to
>>>>>> 4.4?
>>>>>
>>>>> For a bit more context, it's also not in 4.14.y, 4.9.y, or 4.4.y.  I
>>>>> found a backported series for 4.4.y in the SLES kernel tree that I could
>>>>> try to import here if it really is a big deal.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm sorry that I did not find them. I only know the SLES  kernel tree at:
>>>> https://github.com/openSUSE/kernel.
>>>> Is there another place for the SLES kernel tree?
>>>
>>> That's the tree you want, look at the SLES branches.  I see the patches
>>> backported to the SLE12-SP4 branch already, so that is hopefully a
>>> working set of patches for 4.4.y.
>>>
>>
>> I checked the SLE12-SP4 branch and the kernel version is 4.12. There is
>> still a lot of conflicts even with 4.14.y. So it's hard to backport to
>> 4.4.y. I will try to solve the conflicts with 4.14.y but I'm not sure if
>> I can solve all the conflicts and finish this job.
> 
> Oops, try looking at the SLE12-SP3 branch, that is 4.4 based.  I don't
> know if they backported the patches there or not though.
> 

No, SLE12-SP3 branch do not have these patches backported.

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> .
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists