netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: Don't assume loopback is supported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19c8d2b3-bffe-b3b2-6e91-e878f89e5247@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Mar 2019 15:48:41 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Jose Abreu <jose.abreu@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Joao Pinto <joao.pinto@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: Don't assume loopback is supported

On 3/14/19 3:37 AM, Jose Abreu wrote:
> Some PHYs may not support loopback mode so we need to check if register
> is read-only.
> 

In that case it may be appropriate to have a specific PHY driver that
implements a set_loopback() method returning -EOPNOTSUPP instead of
changing the generic PHY implementation.

> Fixes: f0f9b4ed2338 ("net: phy: Add phy loopback support in net phy framework")
> Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Joao Pinto <joao.pinto@...opsys.com>

This looks fine anyway:

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index 49fdd1ee798e..a749639d98c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -1918,8 +1918,24 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(genphy_resume);
>  
>  int genphy_loopback(struct phy_device *phydev, bool enable)
>  {
> -	return phy_modify(phydev, MII_BMCR, BMCR_LOOPBACK,
> -			  enable ? BMCR_LOOPBACK : 0);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = phy_modify(phydev, MII_BMCR, BMCR_LOOPBACK,
> +			 enable ? BMCR_LOOPBACK : 0);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = phy_read(phydev, MII_BMCR);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (enable) {
> +		if (ret & BMCR_LOOPBACK)
> +			return 0;
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(genphy_loopback);
>  
> 


-- 
Florian