netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] rhashtable: don't hold lock on first table throughout insertion.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190315054709.mlcctcv3qy57wini@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 15 Mar 2019 13:47:09 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc:     Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] rhashtable: don't hold lock on first table
 throughout insertion.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 04:05:28PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> rhashtable_try_insert() currently holds a lock on the bucket in
> the first table, while also locking buckets in subsequent tables.
> This is unnecessary and looks like a hold-over from some earlier
> version of the implementation.
> 
> As insert and remove always lock a bucket in each table in turn, and
> as insert only inserts in the final table, there cannot be any races
> that are not covered by simply locking a bucket in each table in turn.
> 
> When an insert call reaches that last table it can be sure that there
> is no matchinf entry in any other table as it has searched them all, and
> insertion never happens anywhere but in the last table.  The fact that
> code tests for the existence of future_tbl while holding a lock on
> the relevant bucket ensures that two threads inserting the same key
> will make compatible decisions about which is the "last" table.
> 
> This simplifies the code and allows the ->rehash field to be
> discarded.
> 
> We still need a way to ensure that a dead bucket_table is never
> re-linked by rhashtable_walk_stop().  This can be achieved by calling
> call_rcu() inside the locked region, and checking with
> rcu_head_after_call_rcu() in rhashtable_walk_stop() to see if the
> bucket table is empty and dead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/rhashtable.h |   13 -----------
>  lib/rhashtable.c           |   50 +++++++++++++-------------------------------
>  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

Thanks! This looks very nice.

> @@ -580,36 +583,14 @@ static void *rhashtable_try_insert(struct rhashtable *ht, const void *key,
>  	struct bucket_table *new_tbl;
>  	struct bucket_table *tbl;
>  	unsigned int hash;
> -	spinlock_t *lock;
>  	void *data;
>  
> -	tbl = rcu_dereference(ht->tbl);
> -
> -	/* All insertions must grab the oldest table containing
> -	 * the hashed bucket that is yet to be rehashed.
> -	 */
> -	for (;;) {
> -		hash = rht_head_hashfn(ht, tbl, obj, ht->p);
> -		lock = rht_bucket_lock(tbl, hash);
> -		spin_lock_bh(lock);
> -
> -		if (tbl->rehash <= hash)
> -			break;
> -
> -		spin_unlock_bh(lock);
> -		tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(tbl->future_tbl, ht);
> -	}
> -
> -	data = rhashtable_lookup_one(ht, tbl, hash, key, obj);
> -	new_tbl = rhashtable_insert_one(ht, tbl, hash, obj, data);
> -	if (PTR_ERR(new_tbl) != -EEXIST)
> -		data = ERR_CAST(new_tbl);
> +	new_tbl = rcu_dereference(ht->tbl);
>  
> -	while (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new_tbl)) {
> +	do {
>  		tbl = new_tbl;
>  		hash = rht_head_hashfn(ht, tbl, obj, ht->p);
> -		spin_lock_nested(rht_bucket_lock(tbl, hash),
> -				 SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> +		spin_lock(rht_bucket_lock(tbl, hash));

One small problem.  I think this needs to be spin_lock_bh.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt