[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190315125434.093afbd1@elisabeth>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 12:54:34 +0100
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
To: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <petrm@...lanox.com>, <idosch@...lanox.com>,
<sd@...asysnail.net>, <mousuanming@...wei.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Mingfangsen <mingfangsen@...wei.com>,
"Zhoukang (A)" <zhoukang7@...wei.com>,
"wangxiaogang (F)" <wangxiaogang3@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vxlan: remove the redundant gro_cells_destroy()
calling.
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 18:06:45 +0800
Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com> wrote:
> From: "Suanming.Mou" <mousuanming@...wei.com>
>
> With ad6c9986bcb6, GRO cells will be destroyed in vxlan_uninit.
Thanks for cleaning this up.
I think it would be nice if you could actually explain in the commit
message why this makes the call in vxlan_destroy_tunnels() redundant.
> Fixes: ad6c9986bcb6 ("vxlan: Fix GRO cells race condition between receive and link delete")
I'm not sure a Fixes: tag is appropriate here (and also if this
shouldn't be targeted for net-next) -- in the end, gro_cells_destroy()
there would just return:
if (!gcells->cells)
return;
> Signed-off-by: Suanming.Mou <mousuanming@...wei.com>
Either way,
Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
--
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists