[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190315.110229.1479393342133382636.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sbrivio@...hat.com
Cc: liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com, petrm@...lanox.com, idosch@...lanox.com,
sd@...asysnail.net, mousuanming@...wei.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
mingfangsen@...wei.com, zhoukang7@...wei.com,
wangxiaogang3@...wei.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vxlan: remove the redundant gro_cells_destroy()
calling.
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 16:28:24 +0100
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 23:18:52 +0800
> Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>> In vxlan_destroy_tunnels func, unregister_netdevice_queue is called after
>> gro_cells_destroy func. However, in unregister_netdevice_queue func, the
>> gro_cells_destroy func will also call the gro_cells_destroy func as the
>> following routine:
>> unregister_netdevice_many() -> rollback_registered_many()
>> -> ndo_uninit() -> gro_cells_destroy()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suanming.Mou <mousuanming@...wei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Zhiqiang Liu <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>
>
> NACK, please read my and Eric's comments to v1 -- giving me more than 23
> minutes to answer would have been a nice touch as well :)
Also the net-next tree is CLOSED.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists