[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190316025448.GD29548@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2019 03:54:48 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: add amlogic g12a mdio mux support
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 03:01:34PM +0100, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> +static int _g12a_enable_internal_mdio(struct g12a_mdio_mux *priv)
>
You would generally use the _ prefix when you have a locked and an
unlocked version. I don't see anything like this here. So please drop
the _ .
Nice to see the generic clock framework being used. I just wonder if
this is the correct place to have this clock code. Can it be made part
of the SoC clock code?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists