netdev - Re: [PATCH] tcp: don't use __constant_cpu_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 16 Mar 2019 16:18:41 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: don't use __constant_cpu_to_be32

On (03/16/19 14:19), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > See my recent commit a0517a0f7ef23 ("selftests/bpf: use
> > __bpf_constant_htons in test_prog.c") where compiler was not smart
> > enough to figure it out (you can google similar issues for GCC < 4.8).
> 
> Allow me to disagree.
> 
> The error in a0517a0f7ef23 says
> 
> 	error: implicit declaration of function '__builtin_bswap16'
> 
> which doesn't sound like "the compiler was not smart".
> 
> Let's look at __swab16
> 
> 100 #ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP16__
> 101 #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
> 102 #else
> 103 #define __swab16(x)                             \
> 104         (__builtin_constant_p((__u16)(x)) ?     \
> 105         ___constant_swab16(x) :                 \
> 106         __fswab16(x))
> 107 #endif
> 
> We can call __builtin_bswap16() only when the compiler has that builtin,
> which is what #ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP16__ for.
> 
> But this is not what tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_endian.h does
> 
> # define __bpf_ntohs(x)                 __builtin_bswap16(x)
> # define __bpf_htons(x)                 __builtin_bswap16(x)
> 
> So I sort of suspect that what should have been done was that
> __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP16__ ifdef, just like what include/uapi/linux/swab.h
> does.

E.g.

#define ____const(x)	printf("const %d\n", (x))
#define ____noconst(x)	printf("noconst %d\n", (x))
#define const_test(x)	(__builtin_constant_p(x) ? ____const((x)) : ____noconst((x)))

The compiler should optimize out !__builtin_constant_p (dead code elimination
phase - dce), if it can compile the code in the first place.

So if we replace ____noconst with

#define ____noconst(x)	printf2("noconst %d\n", (x))

then compiler wouldn't be able to compile the code and thus wouldn't
be able to perform dce.

__builtin_constant_p, unlike `#if 0', is not handled by the preprocessor.

Verified with gcc 8.3, gcc 4.9, gcc 4.7 at compiler explorer website
https://gcc.godbolt.org/ - GCC is smart enough to figure out
__builtin_constant_p and do dce, given that it compile the code.

	-ss