netdev - Re: [net 1/1] tipc: allow service ranges to be connect()'ed on RDM/DGRAM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190316.121902.229584745323999088.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Sat, 16 Mar 2019 12:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     jon.maloy@...csson.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, gordan.mihaljevic@...tech.com.au,
        tung.q.nguyen@...tech.com.au, hoang.h.le@...tech.com.au,
        canh.d.luu@...tech.com.au, ying.xue@...driver.com,
        tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [net 1/1] tipc: allow service ranges to be connect()'ed on
 RDM/DGRAM

From: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 21:11:00 +0100

> @@ -2349,6 +2349,16 @@ static int tipc_wait_for_connect(struct socket *sock, long *timeo_p)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int tipc_sockaddr_is_sane(struct sockaddr_tipc *addr)
> +{
> +	if (addr->family != AF_TIPC)
> +		return 0;

I think bool and true/false are most appropriate for this function.