| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 15:38:07 -0700
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
"jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com" <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: rtnetlink: Add link-down reason to
RTNL messages
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:56 AM Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
> In general, after a port is put administratively up, certain handshake
> protocols have to finish successfully, otherwise the port is left in a
> NO-CARRIER or DORMANT state. When that happens, it would be useful to
> communicate the reasons to the administrator, so that the problem that
> prevents the link from being established can be corrected.
>
> Introduce two new link attributes: IFLA_LINK_DOWN_REASON_MAJOR and
> _MINOR. Major reason code serve as broad categories intended to convey a
> general idea of where the problem is. Minor codes are arbitrary numbers
> specific for the driver that add detail to the major reasons. Add enum
> rtnl_link_down_reason_major to define the well-known major reason codes.
>
> The party with visibility into details of this process is the driver.
> Therefore add two new RTNL hooks, link_down_reason_get_size and
> fill_link_down_reason, to provide the necessary information.
>
> Link-down reason is not included if the port is up or administratively
> down, because those two state are easy to discover through existing
> interfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>
This looks good and will be use-full. But i have some comments on the
implementation below.
Also, carrier can go down due to protocol down (IFLA_PROTODOWN). And I
get asked about supporting
reason codes or protocol owner for such protodown reason (I have not
given it much thought yet. I will see if there is a way
to use your series for that as well).
> ---
> include/net/rtnetlink.h | 3 +++
> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/rtnetlink.h b/include/net/rtnetlink.h
> index e2091bb2b3a8..cfd9e86ff0ca 100644
> --- a/include/net/rtnetlink.h
> +++ b/include/net/rtnetlink.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ struct rtnl_link_ops {
> int (*fill_linkxstats)(struct sk_buff *skb,
> const struct net_device *dev,
> int *prividx, int attr);
> + size_t (*link_down_reason_get_size)(const struct net_device *dev);
> + int (*fill_link_down_reason)(struct sk_buff *skb,
> + const struct net_device *dev);
> };
Any reason to restrict this to network interfaces which support rtnl_link_ops ?.
I also saw that you added rtnl_link_ops to mlxsw for this. Which also
means every driver will now have to declare rtnl_link_ops to use this
?.
I think we should keep rtnl_link_ops to logical links like bridge,
bonds etc (ie which support newlink and dellink).
Can't we use netdev_ops for this ?. That will allow any driver to just
support this readily.
>
> int __rtnl_link_register(struct rtnl_link_ops *ops);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> index 5b225ff63b48..a47f42e79741 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
> @@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ enum {
> IFLA_NEW_IFINDEX,
> IFLA_MIN_MTU,
> IFLA_MAX_MTU,
> + IFLA_LINK_DOWN_REASON_MAJOR, /* enum rtnl_link_down_reason_major */
> + IFLA_LINK_DOWN_REASON_MINOR,
> __IFLA_MAX
> };
>
> @@ -239,6 +241,20 @@ enum in6_addr_gen_mode {
> IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_RANDOM,
> };
>
> +enum rtnl_link_down_reason_major {
> + RTNL_LDR_OTHER,
> + RTNL_LDR_NO_CABLE,
> + RTNL_LDR_UNSUPPORTED_CABLE,
> + RTNL_LDR_AUTONEG_FAILURE,
> + RTNL_LDR_NO_LINK_PARTNER,
> + RTNL_LDR_LINK_TRAINING_FAILURE,
> + RTNL_LDR_LOGICAL_MISMATCH,
> + RTNL_LDR_REMOTE_FAULT,
> + RTNL_LDR_BAD_SIGNAL_INTEGRITY,
> + RTNL_LDR_CALIBRATION_FAILURE,
> + RTNL_LDR_POWER_BUDGET_EXCEEDED,
> +};
prefer LINK_DOWN_REASON_* or LINKDOWN_REASON_*
(Though there is no predefined convention, the prefix RTNL makes it
feel like a top-level attribute when its really a value for an IFLA_*
attribute.)
> +
> /* Bridge section */
>
> enum {
> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> index a51cab95ba64..206795f13850 100644
> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> @@ -979,6 +979,22 @@ static size_t rtnl_xdp_size(void)
> return xdp_size;
> }
>
> +static bool rtnl_should_fill_link_down_reason(const struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + return (dev->flags & IFF_UP) && !netif_oper_up(dev) &&
> + dev->rtnl_link_ops &&
> + dev->rtnl_link_ops->link_down_reason_get_size &&
> + dev->rtnl_link_ops->fill_link_down_reason;
> +}
> +
> +static size_t rtnl_link_down_reason_get_size(const struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + if (!rtnl_should_fill_link_down_reason(dev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + return dev->rtnl_link_ops->link_down_reason_get_size(dev);
> +}
> +
> static noinline size_t if_nlmsg_size(const struct net_device *dev,
> u32 ext_filter_mask)
> {
> @@ -1026,6 +1042,7 @@ static noinline size_t if_nlmsg_size(const struct net_device *dev,
> + nla_total_size(4) /* IFLA_CARRIER_DOWN_COUNT */
> + nla_total_size(4) /* IFLA_MIN_MTU */
> + nla_total_size(4) /* IFLA_MAX_MTU */
> + + rtnl_link_down_reason_get_size(dev)
> + 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1683,6 +1700,9 @@ static int rtnl_fill_ifinfo(struct sk_buff *skb,
> nla_put_s32(skb, IFLA_NEW_IFINDEX, new_ifindex) < 0)
> goto nla_put_failure;
>
> + if (rtnl_should_fill_link_down_reason(dev) &&
> + dev->rtnl_link_ops->fill_link_down_reason(skb, dev))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> if (rtnl_fill_link_af(skb, dev, ext_filter_mask))
> @@ -1742,6 +1762,8 @@ static const struct nla_policy ifla_policy[IFLA_MAX+1] = {
> [IFLA_CARRIER_DOWN_COUNT] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> [IFLA_MIN_MTU] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> [IFLA_MAX_MTU] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> + [IFLA_LINK_DOWN_REASON_MAJOR] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> + [IFLA_LINK_DOWN_REASON_MINOR] = { .type = NLA_U32 },
> };
>
> static const struct nla_policy ifla_info_policy[IFLA_INFO_MAX+1] = {
> --
> 2.4.11
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists