netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] rhashtable: rename rht_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72ncNHCrE+YRePDCPGgKoKYCSL0mwJXP0jBjYP6W4CVSKA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 17 Mar 2019 08:50:11 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc:     Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] rhashtable: rename rht_for_each*continue as *from.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:10 AM NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com> wrote:
>
> The pattern set by list.h is that for_each..continue()
> iterators start at the next entry after the given one,
> while for_each..from() iterators start at the given
> entry.
>
> The rht_for_each*continue() iterators are documented as though the
> start at the 'next' entry, but actually start at the given entry,
> and they are used expecting that behaviour.
> So fix the documentation and change the names to *from for consistency
> with list.h

Thank you for taking care of the .clang-format changes!

Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>

Cheers,
Miguel