[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFXsbZqzGb8=WoZ9Co9xQZvHk=Fkc7LdYxZx41BW4p6Px1u_sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:18:47 -0700
From: Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
dongsheng.wang@...-semitech.com, clemens.gruber@...ruber.com,
hkallweit1@...il.com, Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>,
harini.katakam@...inx.com
Subject: Re: regression from: net: phy: marvell: Avoid unnecessary soft reset
> Some of the older Marvell switches use the 1540 for its internal
> PHYs. Same OUI as the external PHY. I don't remember which
> switches. Maybe the mv88e6161 in the RDU1?
>
I'm using a Marvell 88E6161 with 5.0.1 and I get the following output
which I think indicates that the 6161 does not use the 1540 PHY:
[ 3.922322] mv88e6085 gpio-0:00: switch 0x1610 detected: Marvell
88E6161, revision 3
[ 4.227851] libphy: mv88e6xxx SMI: probed
[ 6.179094] mv88e6085 gpio-0:00 netaux (uninitialized): PHY
[mv88e6xxx-1:01] driver [Marvell 88E1121R]
[ 6.220290] mv88e6085 gpio-0:00 netright (uninitialized): PHY
[mv88e6xxx-1:03] driver [Marvell 88E1121R]
[ 6.268894] mv88e6085 gpio-0:00 netleft (uninitialized): PHY
[mv88e6xxx-1:04] driver [Marvell 88E1121R]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists