[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o968y1uv.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 10:21:28 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fw@...eb.enyo.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Law <law@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] y2038: fix socket.h header inclusion
* Arnd Bergmann:
> Should we just remove __kernel_fd_set from the exported headers and
> define the internal fd_set directly in include/linux/types.h? (Adding the
> folks from the old thread to Cc).
The type is used in the sanitizers, but incorrectly. They assume that
FD_SETSIZE is always 1024. (The existence of __kernel_fd_set is
itself somewhat questionable because it leads to such bugs.) Moving
around the type could cause a build failure in the sanitizers, but I'm
not entirely clear how the UAPI headers are included there.
Otherwise, I couldn't find any uses.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists