[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190319153005.GA1146@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:30:05 +0000
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Fix proc_do_large_bitmap for large input buffers
On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 10:43:09PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 2/20/19 5:32 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Today, proc_do_large_bitmap() truncates a large write input buffer
> > to PAGE_SIZE - 1, which may result in misparsed numbers at the
> > (truncated) end of the buffer. Further, it fails to notify the caller
> > that the buffer was truncated, so it doesn't get called iteratively
> > to finish the entire input buffer.
> >
> > Tell the caller if there's more work to do by adding the skipped
> > amount back to left/*lenp before returning.
> >
> > To fix the misparsing, reset the position if we have completely
> > consumed a truncated buffer (or if just one char is left, which
> > may be a "-" in a range), and ask the caller to come back for
> > more.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
>
> Would be nice to fix this bug. I submitted the test node patch as well
> as an attempt to integrate it into the test harness, though there's
> wonkiness there still, and I could use more experienced eyes.
Sorry for the delay.
I'm rolling these changes in with some minor adjustments, can you send
me your respective lib/test_sysctl.c changes? I don't see that they had
been sent.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists