[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5fa79d98a5c1fcfab2d1e51f91681325eab1b08.camel@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:22:49 +0000
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] tools/bpf: generate pkg-config file for
libbpf
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 16:17 -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 03/19, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Generate a libbpf.pc file at build time so that users can rely
> > on pkg-config to find the library, its CFLAGS and LDFLAGS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>
> > ---
> > v2: use QUIET_GEN instead of QUIET_LINK to generate pc file,
> > save kernel version in its own variable instead of calling
> > make inline
> >
> > tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore | 1 +
> > tools/lib/bpf/Makefile | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.pc.template | 11 +++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.pc.template
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore b/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore
> > index 4db74758c674..7d9e182a1f51 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/.gitignore
> > @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> > libbpf_version.h
> > +libbpf.pc
> > FEATURE-DUMP.libbpf
> > test_libbpf
> > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
> > index a05c43468bd0..1df3ebfb3118 100644
> > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
> > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/Makefile
> > @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ libdir_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(libdir))
> > libdir_relative_SQ = $(subst ','\'',$(libdir_relative))
> >
> > LIB_FILE = libbpf.a libbpf.so
> > +PC_FILE = libbpf.pc
> >
> > VERSION = $(BPF_VERSION)
> > PATCHLEVEL = $(BPF_PATCHLEVEL)
> > @@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ OBJ = $@
> > N =
> >
> > LIBBPF_VERSION =
> > $(BPF_VERSION).$(BPF_PATCHLEVEL).$(BPF_EXTRAVERSION)
> > +KERNEL_VERSION = $(shell make --no-print-directory -sC ../../..
> > kernelversion)
> Oh, we do already have LIBBPF_VERSION, why not use that? This way
> you don't need to do anything for out-of-tree libbpf from github.
>
> I don't remember what was the strategy regarding libbpf versioning,
> but
> that 0.0.1 should be changed to something sensible (be set to the
> kernel
> version upon release?)
[re-sending as reply via phone added html and the list daemon said no-
no]
That looks like the ABI version though, rather than the source version?
The source version is more appropriate for the PC file
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists