[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c44f3a3f0d74e65b1db9544cf50555f76c8daab4.camel@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 05:02:00 +0000
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: "eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"pakki001@....edu" <pakki001@....edu>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
"weiyongjun1@...wei.com" <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
"kjlu@....edu" <kjlu@....edu>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ilya Lesokhin <ilyal@...lanox.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: mlx5: Add a missing check on idr_find, free buf
On Tue, 2019-03-19 at 21:54 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> On 03/19/2019 02:42 PM, Aditya Pakki wrote:
> > idr_find() can return a NULL value to 'flow' which is used without
> > a
> > check. The patch adds a check to avoid potential NULL pointer
> > dereference.
> >
> > In case of mlx5_fpga_sbu_conn_sendmsg() failure, free buf allocated
> > using kzalloc.
> >
> > Fixes: ab412e1dd7db ("net/mlx5: Accel, add TLS rx offload
> > routines")
> > ---
> > v3: Reorder buf allocations and flow check.
> > v2: failure to return in case of flow failure.
> > v1: Failed to free buf in case of flow failure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aditya Pakki <pakki001@....edu>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/tls.c | 14
> > +++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/tls.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/tls.c
> > index 5cf5f2a9d51f..8de64e88c670 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/tls.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fpga/tls.c
> > @@ -217,15 +217,21 @@ int mlx5_fpga_tls_resync_rx(struct
> > mlx5_core_dev *mdev, u32 handle, u32 seq,
> > void *cmd;
> > int ret;
> >
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + flow = idr_find(&mdev->fpga->tls->rx_idr, ntohl(handle));
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> This looks suspect (even before your patch)
>
> What prevents flow from disappearing after this rcu_read_lock() ?
>
> IMO your patch might prevent a NULL deref, but not use-after-free.
That crossed my mind when i reviewed this patch but since this is an
old issue i just put a todo aside to handle it later
i think the author didn't want to deal with use-after-free here, but
only wanted to keep the data structure safe against add/remove
operations.
Anyway all we need here is
rcu_read_lock()
flow = idr_find(..)
mlx5_fpga_tls_flow_to_cmd(flow, cmd);
rcu_read_unlock()
Will fix it up in a follow up patch,
Thank you Eric !!
>
> > +
> > + if (!flow) {
> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "Received NULL pointer for handle\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > buf = kzalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > if (!buf)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > cmd = (buf + 1);
> >
> > - rcu_read_lock();
> > - flow = idr_find(&mdev->fpga->tls->rx_idr, ntohl(handle));
> > - rcu_read_unlock();
> > mlx5_fpga_tls_flow_to_cmd(flow, cmd);
> >
> > MLX5_SET(tls_cmd, cmd, swid, ntohl(handle));
> > @@ -238,6 +244,8 @@ int mlx5_fpga_tls_resync_rx(struct
> > mlx5_core_dev *mdev, u32 handle, u32 seq,
> > buf->complete = mlx_tls_kfree_complete;
> >
> > ret = mlx5_fpga_sbu_conn_sendmsg(mdev->fpga->tls->conn, buf);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + kfree(buf);
> >
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists