lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMDZJNWZ_LAAFiFQAh9dw93TQnYJzkax2TRgTgnDp=72xF=YFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:57:44 +0800
From:   Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
To:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/4] net/mlx5e: Make little improvement for mlx5e

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:03 PM <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>
> This serial patches are not bugfixes, and just little improvement for mlx5e.
> v3->v4:
> Patch4: change the long message info and introduce a helper function.
>
> v2->v3:
> Patch 1 and 5 are merged to patch 4 now.
>
> v1->v2
> Patch 1: remove the duplicated error messages and stick to extack only
> Patch 2: use the 'unknown' instead of empty string
> Patch 5: is new patch
>
> Tonghao Zhang (4):
>   net/mlx5e: Make the log friendly when decapsulation offload not
>     supported
>   net/mlx5e: Remove 'parse_attr' argument in parse_tc_fdb_actions()
>   net/mlx5e: Deletes unnecessary setting of esw_attr->parse_attr
>   net/mlx5e: Return -EOPNOTSUPP when attempting to offload an
>     unsupported action
>
>  .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/tc_tun.c    |  8 ++++--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c    | 32 +++++++++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Saeed, this series patch will be applied ? and this one:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1048873/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ