[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ecd48b3-92d6-38a1-11db-5c7b6a0ae341@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 22:23:36 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: John Linville <linville@...driver.com>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: New ethtool sub-feature and ethtool-netlink
Hi Michal / John,
I have an ethtool extension in the pipe that adds one more PHY tunable
sub-feature (for Fast Link Down support). Are smaller extensions still
ok for ethtool, or IOW: When do you think is ethtool-netlink going to
be stable enough so that other developers can add features?
Heiner
Powered by blists - more mailing lists