[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpW-Rz9yiYjvJ-tes9P7DbRWU_YNqhOQ5UPViK17fR46cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:39:36 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: "Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant" <ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk>
Cc: "jhs@...atatu.com" <jhs@...atatu.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1 v2] net: sched: Introduce conndscp action
Hello,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 7:09 AM Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant
<ldir@...byshire-bryant.me.uk> wrote:
>
> Conndscp is a new tc filter action module. It is designed to copy DSCPs
> to conntrack marks and the reverse operation of conntrack mark contained
> DSCPs to the diffserv field of suitable skbs.
>
Is it possible and feasible to integrate this into connmark?
Both are intended to retrieve information from conntrack and store
it into skb. I know the name "connmark" already says it is a mark,
while yours isn't, I still want to see if we can avoid code duplications.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists