[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85255236-51ef-bcfc-9270-99b503047497@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 22:58:16 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Martin Lau <kafai@...com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Propagate cn to TCP
On 03/23/2019 06:14 PM, Lawrence Brakmo wrote:
> There was no eBPF at that time. We like the flexibility we get by programing
> the algorithms in eBPF.
eBPF being there does not mean we can adopt whatever research work,
we want evaluations of the costs and benefits.
>
> These are not intrusive changes, they simply extend the current limited return
> values form cgroup skb egress BPF programs to be more in line with qdiscs.
They are quite intrusive changes to IP layer, we can not deny this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists