[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190324080154.GD2327@nanopsycho>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 09:01:54 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
idosch@...lanox.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 11/15] nfp: move devlink port type set after
netdev registration
Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 04:04:05AM CET, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 23:47:50 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >type setting. I'd rather those calls happened on fully initialized
>> >netdev (and port), could you perhaps just take this patch into the
>>
>> I don't get it, you are commenting cleanup part. On init, the type set
>> happens on fully initialized devlink_port and netdev.
>
>I'm talking about internal nfp API calls, nfp_app_vnic_init() and
>nfp_app_vnic_clean() should be called while vNIC is completely
>initialized and registered from stack's PoV. netdev, and devlink
>port fully initialized and set up. I don't think it matters much,
>just an imperfection.
Oh, I get it. Will change the order. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists