netdev - Re: [patch net-next v2 11/15] nfp: move devlink port type set after netdev registration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 24 Mar 2019 09:01:54 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        idosch@...lanox.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
        vivien.didelot@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v2 11/15] nfp: move devlink port type set after
 netdev registration

Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 04:04:05AM CET, jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com wrote:
>On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 23:47:50 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >type setting.  I'd rather those calls happened on fully initialized
>> >netdev (and port), could you perhaps just take this patch into the  
>> 
>> I don't get it, you are commenting cleanup part. On init, the type set
>> happens on fully initialized devlink_port and netdev.
>
>I'm talking about internal nfp API calls, nfp_app_vnic_init() and
>nfp_app_vnic_clean() should be called while vNIC is completely
>initialized and registered from stack's PoV.  netdev, and devlink 
>port fully initialized and set up.  I don't think it matters much, 
>just an imperfection.

Oh, I get it. Will change the order. Thanks.