lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:42:09 +0100
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: aquantia: report PHY details like
 firmware version

On 24.03.2019 02:04, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/23/2019 6:15 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Add reporting firmware details. These details are available only once
>> the firmware has finished initializing the chip. This can take some
>> time and we need to poll for init completion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
>> ---
> 
> [snip]
>>  
>> +/* If we configure settings whilst firmware is still initializing the chip,
>> + * then these settings may be overwritten. Therefore make sure chip
>> + * initialization has completed. Use presence of the firmware ID as
>> + * indicator for initialization having completed.
>> + * The chip also provides a "reset completed" bit, but it's cleared after
>> + * read. Therefore function would time out if called again.
>> + */
> 
> Is there a way to say, run a checksum calculation on the firmware image
> to assess its health/validity as well as read the firmware ID? What
> happens if the PHY is not provisioned with a firmware image? Is it
> expecting for a specific set of MDIO vendor commands to load it over MDIO?
> 
It's also possible to load firmware over MDIO, but typically an internal
boot loader reads the firmware directly from a SPI NOR flash.
Vendor registers allow access to the flash and it should be possible to
expose the flash as MTD, but that's a different exercise (I think some
experimental work has been done in that direction already).
Based on the datasheet I'm not sure whether the PHY can work w/o firmware.
The firmware is more than the provisioned register defaults.


>> +static void aqr107_wait_reset_complete(struct phy_device *phydev)
>> +{
>> +	int val, retries = 100;
>> +
>> +	do {
>> +		val = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_VEND1, VEND1_GLOBAL_FW_ID);
>> +		if (val < 0)
>> +			return;
>> +		msleep(20);
>> +	} while (!val && --retries);
> 
> Should not this return 0/-ETIMEDOUT and have the caller propagate that
> error code?
> 
Yes, most likely it's better to do this. I'll add it in a v2.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists