[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49500e18-f2d5-4c9f-2ce0-b6fa12cbc8d6@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 10:06:08 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 03/13] net: dsa: Create a more convenient
function for installing port VLANs
On 3/23/19 8:23 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> This refactors the two-phase transaction from dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid
> and also makes that code available for other functions from within DSA.
> The newly exposed function either adds or deletes the specified VLAN
> entry based on a boolean argument.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
The name of the function does not make it particularly clear that
passing false results in deleting the VLAN. Can you just wrap this under
a different function name that is only doing the two-step adding of
VLANs and keep using dsa_port_vlan_del() explicitly when you want to
remove a VLAN?
> ---
> net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 2 ++
> net/dsa/port.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/dsa/slave.c | 16 ++--------------
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
> index 093b7d145eb1..8048ced3708f 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
> @@ -164,6 +164,8 @@ int dsa_port_pre_bridge_flags(const struct dsa_port *dp, unsigned long flags,
> struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> int dsa_port_bridge_flags(const struct dsa_port *dp, unsigned long flags,
> struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> +int dsa_port_trans_vlan_apply(struct dsa_port *dp, u16 vid, u16 flags,
> + bool enabled);
> int dsa_port_vlan_add(struct dsa_port *dp,
> const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan,
> struct switchdev_trans *trans);
> diff --git a/net/dsa/port.c b/net/dsa/port.c
> index a86fe3be1261..9c7358f98004 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/port.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/port.c
> @@ -326,6 +326,30 @@ int dsa_port_vlan_del(struct dsa_port *dp,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +int dsa_port_trans_vlan_apply(struct dsa_port *dp, u16 vid, u16 flags,
> + bool enabled)
> +{
> + struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan vlan = {
> + .obj.id = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN,
> + .flags = flags,
> + .vid_begin = vid,
> + .vid_end = vid,
> + };
> + struct switchdev_trans trans;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (!enabled)
> + return dsa_port_vlan_del(dp, &vlan);
> +
> + trans.ph_prepare = true;
> + err = dsa_port_vlan_add(dp, &vlan, &trans);
> + if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> + return 0;
> +
> + trans.ph_prepare = false;
> + return dsa_port_vlan_add(dp, &vlan, &trans);
> +}
> +
> static struct phy_device *dsa_port_get_phy_device(struct dsa_port *dp)
> {
> struct device_node *phy_dn;
> diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
> index 093eef6f2599..3191ef74f6a1 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/slave.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
> @@ -987,13 +987,6 @@ static int dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *dev, __be16 proto,
> u16 vid)
> {
> struct dsa_port *dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
> - struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan vlan = {
> - .vid_begin = vid,
> - .vid_end = vid,
> - /* This API only allows programming tagged, non-PVID VIDs */
> - .flags = 0,
> - };
> - struct switchdev_trans trans;
> struct bridge_vlan_info info;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1010,13 +1003,8 @@ static int dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *dev, __be16 proto,
> return -EBUSY;
> }
>
> - trans.ph_prepare = true;
> - ret = dsa_port_vlan_add(dp, &vlan, &trans);
> - if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> - return 0;
> -
> - trans.ph_prepare = false;
> - return dsa_port_vlan_add(dp, &vlan, &trans);
> + /* This API only allows programming tagged, non-PVID VIDs */
> + return dsa_port_trans_vlan_apply(dp, vid, 0, true);
> }
>
> static int dsa_slave_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev, __be16 proto,
>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists