netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 17/28] thunderbolt: Add support for full PCIe daisy chains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190325112206.GH3622@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:22:06 +0200
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/28] thunderbolt: Add support for full PCIe daisy
 chains

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:16:16PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Yes, but my point is that it doesn't make much sense to establish a tunnel
> between a switch and one of its parent switches unless that parent switch
> is reachable from the root switch over a PCI tunnel or a series of PCI
> tunnels.
>
> It may be worth checking that condition, or, if new tunnels are established
> top-down in the daisy-chain and tunnel establishment has failed for a
> switch, to not establish tunnels for switches beyond that one.

OK, got it :)