netdev - [PATCH/RFC bpf-next 01/16] bpf: turn "enum bpf_reg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1553623539-15474-2-git-send-email-jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 18:05:24 +0000
From:   Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
To:     alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        oss-drivers@...ronome.com, Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH/RFC bpf-next 01/16] bpf: turn "enum bpf_reg_liveness" into bit representation

"enum bpf_reg_liveness" is actually used as bit instead of integer. For
example:

        if (live & (REG_LIVE_READ | REG_LIVE_WRITTEN | REG_LIVE_DONE))

Using enum to represent bit is error prone, better to use explicit bit
macros.

Signed-off-by: Jiong Wang <jiong.wang@...ronome.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 16 +++++++++-------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c        |  5 ++---
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 7d8228d..f03c86a 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -34,12 +34,14 @@
  * but of the link between it and its parent.  See mark_reg_read() and
  * mark_stack_slot_read() in kernel/bpf/verifier.c.
  */
-enum bpf_reg_liveness {
-	REG_LIVE_NONE = 0, /* reg hasn't been read or written this branch */
-	REG_LIVE_READ, /* reg was read, so we're sensitive to initial value */
-	REG_LIVE_WRITTEN, /* reg was written first, screening off later reads */
-	REG_LIVE_DONE = 4, /* liveness won't be updating this register anymore */
-};
+/* Reg hasn't been read or written this branch. */
+#define REG_LIVE_NONE		0x0
+/* Reg was read, so we're sensitive to initial value. */
+#define REG_LIVE_READ		0x1
+/* Reg was written first, screening off later reads. */
+#define REG_LIVE_WRITTEN	0x2
+/* Liveness won't be updating this register anymore. */
+#define REG_LIVE_DONE		0x4
 
 struct bpf_reg_state {
 	/* Ordering of fields matters.  See states_equal() */
@@ -131,7 +133,7 @@ struct bpf_reg_state {
 	 * pointing to bpf_func_state.
 	 */
 	u32 frameno;
-	enum bpf_reg_liveness live;
+	u8 live;
 };
 
 enum bpf_stack_slot_type {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index dffeec3..6cc8c38 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -407,8 +407,7 @@ static char slot_type_char[] = {
 	[STACK_ZERO]	= '0',
 };
 
-static void print_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
-			   enum bpf_reg_liveness live)
+static void print_liveness(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u8 live)
 {
 	if (live & (REG_LIVE_READ | REG_LIVE_WRITTEN | REG_LIVE_DONE))
 	    verbose(env, "_");
@@ -5687,8 +5686,8 @@ static bool check_ids(u32 old_id, u32 cur_id, struct idpair *idmap)
 static void clean_func_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			     struct bpf_func_state *st)
 {
-	enum bpf_reg_liveness live;
 	int i, j;
+	u8 live;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) {
 		live = st->regs[i].live;
-- 
2.7.4