netdev - Re: [RFC bpf-next v3 6/8] flow_dissector: handle no-skb use case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:30:13 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>
Cc:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Petar Penkov <peterpenkov96@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next v3 6/8] flow_dissector: handle no-skb use case

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:17:19AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On 03/26, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:52 AM Willem de Bruijn
> > <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> > > The BPF flow dissector should work the same. It is fine to pass the
> > > data including ethernet header, but parsing can start at nhoff with
> > > proto explicitly passed.
> > >
> > > We should not assume Ethernet link layer.
> > 
> > then skb-less dissector has to be different program type
> > because semantics are different.
> The semantics are the same as for c-based __skb_flow_dissect.
> We just need to pass nhoff and proto that has been passed to
> __skb_flow_dissect to the bpf program. In case of with-skb,
> take this initial data from skb, like __skb_flow_dissect does (and don't
> ask BPF program to do it essentially):
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf.git/tree/net/core/flow_dissector.c#n763
> 
> I was thinking of passing proto as flow_keys->n_proto and we already
> pass flow_keys->nhoff, so no need to do anything for it. With that,
> BPF program doesn't need to look into skb and can parse optional vlan
> and L3+ headers. The same way __skb_flow_dissect does that.

makes sense. then I'd also prefer for proto to be in flow_keys to
high light this difference.
may be add vlan_proto/present/tci there as well?
At least on the kernel side ctx rewriter will be the same for w/ & w/o skb cases.