[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb78c8b7-8ea1-de40-da5f-f9e9259f72de@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:24:51 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 13/13] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Add
documentation for NXP SJA1105 driver
On 3/23/2019 8:23 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/sja1105.txt | 123 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/sja1105.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/sja1105.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/sja1105.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..2c82b6fc37e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/sja1105.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> +NXP SJA1105 switch driver
> +=========================
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible: Must be "nxp,sja1105". Device ID identification (one of
> + E/T/P/Q/R/S) is performed by driver at probe time. Swapping pin-compatible
> + parts is possible with no DTS change.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +
> +- sja1105,mac-mode, sja1105,phy-mode: Boolean properties that can be assigned
> + under each port node that is MII or RMII (has no effect for RGMII). By
> + default (unless otherwise specified) a port is configured as MAC if it is
> + driving a PHY (phy-handle is present) or as PHY if it is PHY-less (fixed-link
> + specified, presumably because it is connected to a MAC). These properties
> + are required in the case where SJA1105 ports are at both ends of an MII/RMII
> + PHY-less setup. One end would need to have sja1105,mac-mode, while the other
> + sja1105,phy-mode.
Typically we would be using a fixed-link with an appropriate 'phy-mode'
property to describe a MAC to MAC connection, this may be seen as a
re-purposing PHY-oriented properties though, so I am fine with that binding:
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists