[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190327.134749.421588036813349408.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hkallweit1@...il.com
Cc: vivien.didelot@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove unneeded cmode
initialization
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:45:13 +0100
> This partially reverts ed8fe20205ac ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: prevent
> interrupt storm caused by mv88e6390x_port_set_cmode"). I missed
> that chip->ports[].cmode is overwritten anyway by the cmode
> caching in mv88e6xxx_setup().
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> ---
> The old code causes no issues, therefore net-next.
This looks straight forward enough that I'll apply it without others
reviewing it.
Applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists